That sounds like ye olde Quaker Oats box! Yes, I've done multiple pinholes with them, but the most fun was a cigarette box and a styrofoam burger box. I assiduously try not to make a "real" camera with pinholes. To me that takes the fun, spontaneity and serendipity out of it.
I was thinking of convex instead of concave, kind of that cool ball covered in cellphone camera units that took spherical super panoramas when it reached the apex of its arc (I saw it on petapixel a while back but am too lazy to find the link) this but analog and slower
here it is
http://www.pcworld.com/article/24196..._panorama.html
Last edited by eddy pula; 14-Jun-2012 at 13:25. Reason: got less lazy
Mamiya 7, 80mm, Ektachrome 100.
What she's looking at is this:
Jonathan
Thanks, tuco. No tripod. This was a trip to Paris about ten years ago so all I had was a little table top tripod with me. When I look at the transparency on a light box there is just a hint of motion blur (from me or her, not sure which) but at screen size it isn't all that apparent. I sure love that camera. I need to use it more.
You know, on second thought I may have been employing a trick I learned from my father. He used to set the legs of his little Leitz tripod pressed against his chest, long leg of the tripod pointing straight down and resting on his sternum with the other two legs tucked up under his collarbone. With the camera on the ball head tightened down for stabilization, he could still hold his eye to the viewfinder and fire away. If you press the shutter while holding your breath I find this works better than a monopod--it's almost second nature to me now. No so good if your heart is beating hard or fast, though. So a tripod may have been used (in a manner of speaking) after all!
Jonathan
Sunday Afternoon on the San Joaquin
Pentax 67II, Acros, Oriental VCRC.
Thomas
Bookmarks