Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: b-r-e-v-i-t-y

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles de Porciúncula
    Posts
    5,816

    Re: b-r-e-v-i-t-y

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Roberts View Post
    One less minor irritant with my morning coffee....
    Thank God life is offering only MINOR irritants these days! It could be (and probably has been, and will be) worse!

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    105

    Re: b-r-e-v-i-t-y

    I feel your pain. One can't do it on this forum but on another I have often put a thread on ignore simply because I could not bear seeing its misspelt title appear in the "New Posts" listing any more. Of course, I never make such mishtakes...

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    333

    Re: b-r-e-v-i-t-y

    incorrect...

    i-t-'-s not i-t-s

  4. #14
    All metric sizes to 24x30 Ole Tjugen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    3,383

    Re: b-r-e-v-i-t-y

    Quote Originally Posted by Annie M. View Post
    incorrect...

    i-t-'-s not i-t-s
    If you are referring to the post immediately above yours, you're wrong: It's correctly spelled its in that case. It's an abbreviation for "it is", where the apostrophe replaces the missing i.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    333

    Re: b-r-e-v-i-t-y

    i's wrong... it's true!

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles de Porciúncula
    Posts
    5,816

    Re: b-r-e-v-i-t-y

    We all know that 'mishtakes' was a joke, but for the grammarians amongst us (or is that 'among' us)... is 'misspelt' possibly 'misspelled'?

  7. #17
    Jim Ewins
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    388

    Re: b-r-e-v-i-t-y

    No, it's the book the priest reads all the time

  8. #18
    Clay
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Asheville, NC
    Posts
    364

    Re: b-r-e-v-i-t-y

    MissPelt was the Neanderthal hot Euro babe of the year of 75,000 BCE. She likes any fresh fruit and loves to cuddle. Her saber toothed kitten is named Blinky. She's a Pisces and loves long walks in the woods looking for fresh animal kills.

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    105

    Re: b-r-e-v-i-t-y

    Quote Originally Posted by BrianShaw View Post
    We all know that 'mishtakes' was a joke, but for the grammarians amongst us (or is that 'among' us)... is 'misspelt' possibly 'misspelled'?
    From the OED:
    misspelt

    Badly or incorrectly spelt.
    a1762 LADY M. W. MONTAGU in R. Dodsley Coll. Poems (1763) I. 98 And lines mis-spelt record my lover's flame. 1838 N. HAWTHORNE Chippings in Twice-told Tales, Some [of the monuments] were inscribed with misspelt prose or rhyme. 1864 W. LEWINS Her Majesty's Mails 204 The ‘blind Letter Office’ is the receptacle for all illegible, misspelt, and misdirected or insufficiently addressed letters or packets. 1959 P. LARKIN Let. 19 Jan. in Sel. Lett. (1992) 298 A tiresome & uneducated girl I was slightly acquainted with in 1944 has sent an envelope full of tripey misspelt poems. 1990 K. CONLON Distant Relations 132 A run-down suburb: shops boarded-up, mis-spelt graffiti everywhere.
    British English seems to prefer "misspelt" to "misspelled" although both are considered valid. For me, "misspelt" trips easier off the tongue (and fingers) than "misspelled", which sounds a little cumbersome - but that's just a question of which version one is used to (or rather: "the version to which one is used"; can't have prepositions hanging out there at the end of a sentence! ) .

    Oh, BTW, the OED has this to say on among/amongst:
    amongst

    Forms: 3-4 amanges, (amongus), 4-6 amonges, 5 -is, -ys, 5-7 amongs, 6 amongest(e, 6- amongst, 'mongst. Northern 3-6 amanges, 5-7 amangs, 7 amangst. Also 5 emanges, -ez, emongis, 6 emonges, emongs, emongest(e. [f. AMONG (amang, emong) with adverbial genitive -es, as in besides, betimes, in 16th c. corrupted to -st, by form-assoc. with superlatives, cf. agains(t, amids(t.]

    Less usual in the primary local sense than among, and, when so used, generally implying dispersion, intermixture, or shifting position.
    (Guess whose local Library card number gives him free access to the on-line version of the OED? )

  10. #20

    Re: b-r-e-v-i-t-y

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobf View Post
    "the version to which one is used"; can't have prepositions hanging out there at the end of a sentence! ) .

    )
    I believe Winston Churchill put it best when he fulminated against "prepositions hanging out there at the end of a sentence", and thundered "That is the kind of language up with which I will not put!"

    Oh yeah, while we're (sort of) on the subject, what exactly is "British English"? Is that the same thing that we used to call English....

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •