Would a Razzle or Littman make a good travel camera ?
Let's say you are planning a long distance trip, and like many of us, scan your negatives.
Good MF cameras require a good scanner ($). Otherwise, what's the point of using those high-end lenses ? And if you shoot hand-held, are you getting genuine value from those fine lenses and scanner ?
Shooting 4x5 film, lets you get by with an Epson scanner. But what's the point of shooting 4x5, if you're hand-holding the shot anyhow ?
With a Razzle/Littman, don't you have to carry around some film holders ?
Is the main point, that a Razzle/Littman can be shot hand-held ? Or is such a camera small, light and portable, compared to a field camera ?
Bookmarks