Post Your Waterfalls

[Heroique]

Here's the Palouse Falls from two years ago at this time...

Attachment 131075

A powerful waterfall – looks like you captured Palouse Falls in its late-spring sublimity.

Here's an unnamed waterfall, west of Palouse Falls, up in the Cascades.



Fancy this – the chilly waters in this image flow down the Yakima River, while those of Palouse Falls flow down the Snake River. Later, the two rivers enter the Columbia River at about the same place, coming in from opposite sides. Then it's through the Columbia Gorge, into the Pacific, up to the clouds, and after rain and snow in the mountains, down to the two original falls once again. An endless journey...

Tachi 4x5
Schneider XL 110mm/5.6
T-Max 100 (in T-Max rs)
Epson 4990/Epson Scan

[mat4226]

Upper Falls, Hocking Hills, Ohio



Tachihara 8x10 + Schneider Symmar-S 480 f/8.4
Ilford HP5+ in Pyrocat HD 1:1.5:100

[Ken Lee]

Upper Falls, Hocking Hills, Ohio

Very handsome !

[Derek Kennedy]

wow mat, thats the sort of image Id want hanging on my wall. Beautifully done.

[klocksib]

Wow, I'll have to third that, Matt. Really well done. I love the composition, the feel of the scene. Nice work.

[Pali K]

Really beautiful image Mat. Just saw it in full res on Flickr and the image is spectacular.

Pali

[StoneNYC]

Gollingfälle, Autumn 2014



Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/martin...r/16814292851/
Original size: https://www.flickr.com/photos/martin...92851/sizes/o/

Chamonix 45F1
Schneider 90mm
Provia 100F 4x5" (two exposures)

Best regards,
Martin

Why two exposures?

[EOTS]

Hi Stone,

that's because of the subject contrast range.
Had no negative film with me.
So I took one exposure for the foreground, in which the water is mainly white,
and one for the water, in which the foreground is underexposed.

Best regards,
Martin

[StoneNYC]

Hi Stone,

that's because of the subject contrast range.
Had no negative film with me.
So I took one exposure for the foreground, in which the water is mainly white,
and one for the water, in which the foreground is underexposed.

Best regards,
Martin

Thanks for trying to explain to this poor Neanderthal, but I'm still not understanding.

If you made two exposures you're still going to end up overexposing one area it's just like making a longer exposure in general, unless you did something different like using some kind graduated density filter to one portion of the image?

Sorry if I'm being slow on this.

[ckagy]

Used two sheets of film?