Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: I.D. This Old 8x10

  1. #11
    Mike Fiction's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    68

    Re: I.D. This Old 8x10

    Thanks guys! - once I got it up on a tripod I found the badge on the bottom of the front standard (i had missed it when it was on the floor) - definitely a 2D. Just heavily modified. It's got a couple missing parts, the rear swing knobs have been removed/lost. Otherwise, it's in decent shape mechanically - the worst part is the bellows, and the physical appearance.

    I'm going to attempt to make the bellows myself 1st and only if I fail will I buy a commercial replacement (camerabellows.com)

    Frank, I picked it all up for $100 - came with a sliding 5x7 back, a 4x5 back, a 6x6 Packard shutter with 3 1/4th in. hole and 5 new blank lens boards.

    Need to source an 8x10 back and the slider block.

    What's the point of a sliding 5x7 back? So you can make 2 exposures on 1 piece of film? I don't think I need this back, I'd rather have a regular 5x7 back. And I don't need the 4x5 back either, I already have two 4x5's

    I would trade someone the sliding 5x7 back for a regular 5x7 back... or an 8x10 back.
    -- Mike Fiction
    homepage: http://www.mikefiction.com
    photo blog: http://mikefiction.tumblr.com

  2. #12
    W K Longcor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    310

    Re: I.D. This Old 8x10

    The "sliding" 5x7 on my camera is an adaptor that fits between camera body and a regular 5x7 back. Check yours out -- You may have a regular 5x7 there -- on top of the slider.

  3. #13
    Mike Fiction's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    68

    Re: I.D. This Old 8x10

    It's definitely just a sliding 5x7 back, no way to remove it - It could be torn apart and turned into a regular 5x7 back, but I don't want to destroy it.

    Unless I have to
    -- Mike Fiction
    homepage: http://www.mikefiction.com
    photo blog: http://mikefiction.tumblr.com

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    2,707

    Re: I.D. This Old 8x10

    The 5x7 sliding back was used for studio portraiture; as you suggest, two exposures on a single sheet. I used one early in my career before roll film became popular in studios, and sheet film declined. The large negative was easy to retouch; my bread and butter years were, of course, before the advent of digital photography. I don't suppose that there is a strong demand for negative retouchers these days.

    Enjoy the fun, you have a great camera!

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Tonopah, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    6,334

    Re: I.D. This Old 8x10

    Quote Originally Posted by Merg Ross View Post
    I don't suppose that there is a strong demand for negative retouchers these days.
    Oh! Thou dost err. I'll send you about 1500 of mine.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Portland, OR.
    Posts
    159

    Re: I.D. This Old 8x10

    About that sliding block: I know there's an orphan one at Blue Moon Camera in Portland, OR. I've seen it with my own eyes and I know exactly what it is, just knot what it fits. You should give them a call and ask for Jake, who should know where it is, what it is, and help you figure out if it will fit what you've got. Just in case though, it is sitting on or near the corner shelf between the two glass cases surrounding their color processor. He'd probably let you have it for a song.

  7. #17
    Mike Fiction's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    68

    Re: I.D. This Old 8x10

    The restoration has begun - I'll make a new thread tonight and post photos as I go along to document the process.

    I'm not a fan of the front shift mod - makes the front standard way too flimsy but I have some ideas to try that will keep the mod working, but make it much more stable.
    -- Mike Fiction
    homepage: http://www.mikefiction.com
    photo blog: http://mikefiction.tumblr.com

Similar Threads

  1. Free 8x10 Announcement
    By Kirk Gittings in forum Announcements
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 18-Apr-2005, 17:31
  2. 4x10 Canham Holders do NOT fit my Lotus Camera
    By Kerry L. Thalmann in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 5-Jan-2005, 19:00
  3. Pushing HP5+ in 8x10
    By David R Munson in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 24-Mar-2002, 13:30
  4. Arca Swiss 8x10 Experiences???
    By hadi alsegaf in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 28-Jul-1999, 11:52
  5. 4x5 best optics w/ Scheider HIGH END BACK sharper than 8x10?
    By Bill Glickman in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 17-May-1999, 04:31

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •