You would get more image circle with most 150s, but most 135s will have more than enough for landscape and still-life.
But, it's always nice to have the extra front rise for shots of tall trees etc.
You would get more image circle with most 150s, but most 135s will have more than enough for landscape and still-life.
But, it's always nice to have the extra front rise for shots of tall trees etc.
I have both, but I usually end up using either a 150mm or a 120mm. The 135mm is just a little "too inbetween", unless I have a very good reason to use that particular lens independent of focal length.
I perfer even tighter spacing: 47, 65, 75, 90, 120, (135), 150, (165), 180, 210, 240, 300, 355, ...
i recently rebuilt my entire lens kit replacing a 110 and 150 with a 135. i was pretty skeptical at first, but the 135 is working BRILLIANTLY. really, i wish i would have made the change sooner. it's a fantastic focal length... if i could only carry one lens, the 135 would be it.
---Scott
www.srosenberg.com
I'd go with a 120MM ---more "wide" for your buck!
There just isn't a whole lot of difference between a 210 and a 150 IMHO.
"I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White
How do you like the 210mm? Would you like to exchange the 210mm for something "a little wider?"
I have one 135mm and two 150mm. I don't know why i always put the 135mm on the camera most of the time. I like it.
Over the years I've always preferred a 150mm for 5x4 work, as my normal lens. I also use a 90mm and a 65mm, and recently began using a 210mm.
However for hand-held work with a Speed/Crown Graphic I find a 135mm more practical.
Ian
I almost exlusively use 210mm and 120mm on 4x5" format.
I'd suggest you go for the 135 if that's the only choice you have besides 150.
G
Bookmarks