Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 66

Thread: Threats=Bans

  1. #51
    Whatever David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    4,658

    Re: Threats=Bans

    Quote Originally Posted by Merg Ross View Post
    Why not delete the whole thread? The point has been made.
    Well, the longer the thread runs, the more colorful the punishments that may be imagined. I rather like the punishment of Damiens the Regicide quoted in the opening to Foucault's Discipline and Punish--

    Quote Originally Posted by Michel Foucault
    On 1 March 1757 Damiens the regicide was condemned "to make the amende honorable before the main door of the Church of Paris", where he was to be "taken and conveyed in a cart, wearing nothing but a shirt, holding a torch of burning wax weighing two pounds"; then, "in the said cart, to the Place de Grève, where, on a scaffold that will be erected there, the flesh will be torn from his breasts, arms, thighs and claves with red-hot pincers, his right hand, holding the knife with which he committed the said parricide, burnt with sulphur, and, on those places where the flesh will be torn away, poured molten lead, boiling oil, burning resin, wax and sulphur melted together and then his body drawn and quartered by four horses and his limbs and body consumed by fire, reduced to ashes and his ashes thrown to the winds"

  2. #52

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,487

    Re: Threats=Bans

    Thank you David!

    It may be that if threats escalate, Kirk may want to use threads like these to establish the background and history....

  3. #53

    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    2,707

    Re: Threats=Bans

    David, very good!

    Perhaps that could appear on the LF Home Page.

    Cheers,
    Merg

  4. #54
    Kirk Gittings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico
    Posts
    9,864

    Re: Threats=Bans

    Quote Originally Posted by Merg Ross View Post
    Good thought, Mark. That is actually what I had in mind; "lock", not "delete".
    Thanks,
    Merg
    Thanks guys, that is the conclusion I came to too. Point made. I'll do it tomorrow.
    Thanks,
    Kirk

    at age 73:
    "The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
    But I have promises to keep,
    And miles to go before I sleep,
    And miles to go before I sleep"

  5. #55

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    101

    Re: Threats=Bans

    Delete as you see fit. And if you do feel there is some aspect of the originating threat that should be taken seriously, then do so. Better safe than sorry.

    Nighty-night and don't let the threat-bugs bite.

  6. #56

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    116

    Re: Threats=Bans

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirk Gittings View Post
    All,
    snip
    As a result of this incident, and after consulting with my fellow moderators, I have decided on a 0 tolerance policy for threats, whether made on or off the forum.
    snip
    Similar behavior in the future, on or off the forum will incur more severe responses. Be warned all.

    This job does not compensate me well enough to put up with such nonsense.

    Thanks all,
    Well, I see it a little bit differently, Kirk. Here you go, threatening "all" of us that if threatened, you'll retaliate.
    Well. Thanks for your threat. It didn't take you long time as a moderator to come with threats to "all", did it? I simply think, that you should take care of your private emails with others privately and not to take it on us all. Simply because I have nothing to do with you private emails and your reactions to them. Please, keep them private! That's my view of your threat. Once

  7. #57

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    8,484

    Re: Threats=Bans

    Once, Kirk didn't threaten you. He stated board policy.

    I don't see how you can interpret setting the limits of acceptable behavior as a threat.

  8. #58

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    116

    Re: Threats=Bans

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Fromm View Post
    snip
    I don't see how you can interpret setting the limits of acceptable behavior as a threat.
    That's not my fault.

  9. #59

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    NY area
    Posts
    1,029

    Re: Threats=Bans

    Quote Originally Posted by David A. Goldfarb View Post
    Well, the longer the thread runs, the more colorful the punishments that may be imagined. I rather like the punishment of Damiens the Regicide quoted in the opening to Foucault's Discipline and Punish--
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Michel Foucault
    On 1 March 1757 Damiens the regicide was condemned "to make the amende honorable before the main door of the Church of Paris", where he was to be "taken and conveyed in a cart, wearing nothing but a shirt, holding a torch of burning wax weighing two pounds"; then, "in the said cart, to the Place de Grève, where, on a scaffold that will be erected there, the flesh will be torn from his breasts, arms, thighs and claves with red-hot pincers, his right hand, holding the knife with which he committed the said parricide, burnt with sulphur, and, on those places where the flesh will be torn away, poured molten lead, boiling oil, burning resin, wax and sulphur melted together and then his body drawn and quartered by four horses and his limbs and body consumed by fire, reduced to ashes and his ashes thrown to the winds"

    Sounds like routine procedure down at Gitmo........


    Seriously though, making threats, or even getting abusive in pm's or emails should have zero tolerance for everyone. If someone is so disturbed as to wish harm, especially physical harm to anyone here, then they simply don't belong here.

  10. #60
    jetcode
    Guest

    Re: Threats=Bans

    some snakes have more than one head ...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •