Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 66

Thread: Threats=Bans

  1. #31

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Whittier, CA
    Posts
    1,138

    Re: Threats=Bans

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Lockrey View Post
    You ought to put a large red B for "banned" next to their names. I know that things can get heated in the Lounge but to get personal is way out there. And I'm with Frank, I'll gut 'em for ya.
    Yeah, to separate the good guys from the bad ones.

    Oh, please...

  2. #32
    Greg Lockrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Temperance, MI
    Posts
    1,980

    Re: Threats=Bans

    Quote Originally Posted by domenico Foschi View Post
    Yeah, to separate the good guys from the bad ones.

    Oh, please...
    It was a joke, Domenico.
    Greg Lockrey

    Wealth is a state of mind.
    Money is just a tool.
    Happiness is pedaling +25mph on a smooth road.



  3. #33

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,736

    Re: Threats=Bans

    A name does not a man make. It is rather the other way around.

    Kirk, you were too kind. You should have put his name in public, along with all the colorful details. And for two reasons: to make everybody aware of his behaviour and to serve as an example.

  4. #34

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Joyce, Washington
    Posts
    1,437

    Re: Threats=Bans

    What nonsense. A public pillory might do the trick. Anyone who behaves so abominably in private should be outed.

  5. #35

    Re: Threats=Bans

    Kirk, I cannot believe you would run into a problem like this, especially right off the bat. I have had several people in the forum advise me not to get so riled up over the left wing oral masturbators in the Lizard Lounge. They may be right, ignoring them might be the best course to take. Not knowing the depth of the threats, I would just ignore them unless they are persistent. Hang in there, Kirk. Everyone I have talked to is glad you have taken on the job as moderator.

  6. #36

    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    2,707

    Re: Threats=Bans

    And so it goes. A pseudonym, with very few posts, implicating two individuals. I rest my case.

  7. #37
    Clay
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Asheville, NC
    Posts
    364

    Re: Threats=Bans

    It is incredible that after only a few days, you get hit with your first venomous email. I had no idea that being a moderator rated combat pay. I think your response is the right one, and if anything, somewhat measured. Keep up the good work, and let's hope this is an outlier.
    Last edited by Ralph Barker; 27-Jun-2008 at 07:29. Reason: quote of inflamatory post deleted

  8. #38

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Blue Ridge of Virginia
    Posts
    196

    Re: Threats=Bans

    One of the defining points of the last several decades of American life has been the loss of simple civility between people. In the past, one was civil even with the staunchest opponent in any arena. No more. Worse yet, it has become generally accepted.

    Kirk, I applaud your decision to ban the offender. Your restraint in making it only a 30 day ban is even more praiseworthy; like many others, I think it should be much longer and additionally, conditioned on a [I]sincere[I] public apology.

    regards,
    Russ

  9. #39

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Whittier, CA
    Posts
    1,138

    Re: Threats=Bans

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Lockrey View Post
    It was a joke, Domenico.
    I do not, I absolutely do not believe you.

    If it keeps going like this it will turn out that you and Frank are two progressive professors of political science in Berkeley who unleash their dark side in this forum.
    Frank more than you, granted....

  10. #40
    kev curry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    827

    Re: Threats=Bans

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Lockrey View Post
    You ought to put a large red B for "banned" next to their names. I know that things can get heated in the Lounge but to get personal is way out there. And I'm with Frank, I'll gut 'em for ya.
    Greg, you make regular practice of indulging in petty ''personal'' attacks, its what you do best. You have the unimpressively long back catalog to prove it. The big red B may return to haunt you.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •