post your Architecture photographs!

[sanchi heuser]

this is an alternative shot, wich one you prefer?

Second one.
The shape of the stairs in the foregrund fits better to the dynamic
of the roof construction. The composition of the picture is much more better.

What I would (try to) save from the first one is the the point where the
upper left part of the roof meets the buildings in the background,
this part is much better on the first picture.

[gsinico]

What I would (try to) save from the first one is the the point where the
upper left part of the roof meets the buildings in the background,
this part is much better on the first picture.[/QUOTE]

I complitely agree with you about the spikes of the roof of the first shot.

I changed trypod now, this in those pics was too small, about 5 feets complitely open.

[Laron]

agree too with the remarks, but actually I would even think of is it important having a handrail or stairs in the foreground? I think it doesnt makes the image/composition/message any stronger, that way I would try to skip it and maybe from the 1st point of view just move forward to avoid anything in the foreground. As we wont have any idea no more where we are standing that way, it would add another layer of mystery, which is somehow related with the message of the building too. to fill the whole composition with just this building (without the profane foreground) also in such a magic/majectic hour could be even stronger and simpler. but this is just my opinion...

[gsinico]

So maybe you can be satisfait...





If you can imagine, there is a round window and a big piano inside...
a nice light will be shooting with a little more blu sky, but I was in the opposite part of the building
to shoot the others 2 pics, and this one is a "by night" version.

[sanchi heuser]

So maybe you can be satisfait...



[IMG]picture[/IMG]

If you can imagine, there is a round window and a big piano inside...
a nice light will be shooting with a little more blu sky, but I was in the opposite part of the building
to shoot the others 2 pics, and this one is a "by night" version.

Hi,

this is great, looks like a landed 23rd centenary space ship.
Here the black sky works good.

But in my taste there's too much mirrowing in the water and I don't like the lamp in the left bottom corner.

You see the 4 tiny white points in the bottom right corner?
I'd crop directly under this four points.
OK, that's just my feeling.

[Thomas Greutmann]

Hamburg, Germany. Building at the docklands (above), reflections of the river Elbe (below)



Linhof Master Technika, Grandagon 65mm @f11, approx. 15 sec. exposure, Kodak TMAX 400 developed in XTOL 1:1

[dperez]

Hutton Towers. Santa Ana, CA
4x5 Arca-Swiss, 90mm Schneider lens, Kodak Portra 400.

[View Larger]
This is one of the pictures I made, while being questioned by the police. See the thread about that encounter here.

I am not entirely happy with this image. I need to start over, but I got so tired of looking at it that I don't know when I'll get around to fixing it, so here it goes. I am open to comments, suggestions, and criticism.

[dperez]

Old Orange County Courthouse. Santa Ana, CA
4x5 Arca-Swiss, 90mm Schneider lens, Kodak Ektar 100.

[View Larger]

[Stephane]

Birkelunded park in Oslo, two week ago

[gsinico]

You see the 4 tiny white points in the bottom right corner?
I'd crop directly under this four points.


I see this little points, I understand, I was there, so I cannot feel as you, BTW, thanks for the comment!