Gentlemen-Artists,
Thank you for your kind remarks regarding the dissertation.
Publication on LULU doesn't seem practical for a 370 page publication. There are also serious issues regarding copyrights on vintage photographs; they are probably obtainable but would take quite some time (I've dealt with large museums before...) and be rather expensive. I doubt that ANY form of publication would ever recoup the expenses involved (not counting what seems to have been a sea of money spent during the four years of research). It should also have two more chapters added, one of which would be composed largely of images by contemporary artists (yes, some of you, if you will allow) such that we know with certainty which lens captured the image.
There may be a short term solution. I have very few good things to say about the university where I completed the degree (an exception would be my saintly supervisor, Dr. Normand). In a final act of insult, I was forced to allow them to place it on the internet (after which no publisher will likely ever be interested). This copy has the copyright issue images deleted but is otherwise complete. If you would, please try this link and let me know if it works: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/505
If it is accessible, please read and hopefully enjoy it. Those of you who are experienced with soft focus lenses - I would be greatly in your debt for useful criticism of the text or suggestions in general.
Warmly & softly,
Russ
Bookmarks