I have a few questions about lenses; which may be oversimplified since many lenses are different, but I was wondering if a slower lens would make a sharper image stopped down than a faster lens. If a lens is generally at its sharpest a few stops down from wide open; wouldn't an F8 stopped down to F16 provide more depth of field at its sharpest point than a 4-5.6 lens only stopped down to 8 or 11? I was in a camera store looking a an f8 super angulon (or maybe grandagon, sorry i can't remember) and the guy behind the counter said that that particular lens, is actually at its sharpest point stopped 3-4 stops down from its minimum aperture. Would this mean, that taking an f8 lens and stopping it down to f32 would put diffraction at a minimum while having as much DOF as possible?
Bookmarks