Hello! With the discussions of films vs. digital, resolution of different lenses and films, etc., I thought I would ask folks how much fine detail adds to the value of a particular image for any given compositon.
I would not think that an average photo could be made into an excellent photo, regardless of how sharp the imaging system is.
As I tried to qualify my own pictures, using the grade school A to F system, I think a excellent optical system, film, developer, etc., would add about a + to a photo compared to a similar scene prepared with an average system (note that I did not say a bad system or bad technique). None of my poor pictures could have ben improved by a superb system. An average, or "C" picture to a C+. The rare A to an A+.
How would folks rate issues such as the impact of resolution, accutance, paper/print type, etc., on their final image? Best regards.
Michael A. Heald
Bookmarks