Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Delacroix on Photography

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    299

    Delacroix on Photography

    From the journal of Eugene Delacroix. September 1, 1859 Strasbourg

    "When a photographer takes a view, all you ever see is a part cut off from the whole: The edge of the picture is as interesting as the center. All you can do suppose an ensemble, of which you only see a portion, apparently chosen by chance.

    ...The photographs which strike you most are those in which the very imperfection of the process as a matter of absolute rendering leaves certain gaps, a certain repose for the eye which permit it to concentrate on only a small number of objects."

    Within the same journal date the artist adds the following profound summary of human visual perception.

    "In the presence of nature herself, it is our imagination that makes the picture: We see neither the blades of grass in a landscape nor the accidents of the skin in a pretty face. Our eye, in its fortunate inability to perceive these infinitesimal details, reports to our mind only the things which it ought to perceive...it does not take into account all that the eye presents to it;it connects the impressions it experiences with others it received earlier, and its enjoyment is dependent on its disposition at the time."

    Perhaps this sums up my love affair with the old and modern soft focus images of the figure and landscape.

    The discussion of photography as art and craft appears to have changed very little in the last 138 years. Many of the others arts, have have made quantum shifts in
    creative intent and perception during this same time frame.

    As an artistic tool (not commercial) could it be that photography has simply bumped up against the inherent limitation of the medium? Is it possible to bust out of the black box so to speak?

    George

  2. #2
    Maris Rusis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Noosa, Australia.
    Posts
    1,215

    Re: Delacroix on Photography

    George, you are right. Photography has inherent limitations that go with its identity as a medium for making pictures.

    If you change its basic nature it's not photography anymore. The possibility that people may call video production (still or motion) or broadcast television photography merely reflects a shallow appreciation of what makes photography really photography.

    The more mature media such as oil painting or marble sculpture have no such identity crises. Acrylic paint and fibreglass formwork don't represent an advance in either.
    Photography:first utterance. Sir John Herschel, 14 March 1839 at the Royal Society. "...Photography or the application of the Chemical rays of light to the purpose of pictorial representation,..".

Similar Threads

  1. The New Color: The Return of Black-and-White
    By tim atherton in forum On Photography
    Replies: 113
    Last Post: 26-Oct-2011, 09:16
  2. The hopeful future of film photography
    By Ed Eubanks in forum On Photography
    Replies: 414
    Last Post: 20-Feb-2011, 07:41
  3. report from Chicago
    By Kirk Gittings in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 195
    Last Post: 15-Jan-2011, 21:07
  4. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 19-Sep-2007, 18:42
  5. Ending Film camera sales + print fading challenge
    By John Flavell in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 307
    Last Post: 28-Aug-2005, 21:19

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •