Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 59

Thread: Kodak's new T-Max 400

  1. #41

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,605

    Re: Kodak's new T-Max 400

    Quote Originally Posted by Ed Richards View Post
    My hope is this will let me move from 100 to 400 for everything. It is already close, and I love the range of 400.
    Ed,

    400 Tmax is a wonderful film and if what Kodak says is true it will be even better. These are exciting times!

    I still don't like the idea of a 10 sheet box though
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

  2. #42

    Re: Kodak's new T-Max 400

    Quote Originally Posted by John Kasaian View Post
    Ed,

    400 Tmax is a wonderful film and if what Kodak says is true it will be even better. These are exciting times!

    I still don't like the idea of a 10 sheet box though
    Agree. I like 25 sheets as a middle of the road compromise. I will mention this to Kodak.

  3. #43

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    NY area
    Posts
    1,029

    Re: Kodak's new T-Max 400

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Kadillak View Post
    Kodak has the technology to accomplish this if they chose to do so but T Max 100 is already as sharp as a hand full of razor blades. It would be trying to put more shine on an already polished diamond. I was told that they are going to leave it as it is.

    Cheers!
    Making Tmax 100 finer grained and higher resolving is something that I would wholeheartedly endorse, especially in roll film. I certainly hope that Kodak decides to improve this film, before Fuji improves Acros and Kodak falls behind.

  4. #44
    Steve Gombosi
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    57

    Re: Kodak's new T-Max 400

    I'm sorry to hear this, since I also shoot a lot of MF (and recently had my grandfather's IIIf-s serviced by Focal Point, so I might shoot some casual 35 as well). An improved TMX might be overkill for LF, but some of us would very much appreciate it in smaller formats.

    Steve
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Kadillak View Post
    Kodak has the technology to accomplish this if they chose to do so but T Max 100 is already as sharp as a hand full of razor blades. It would be trying to put more shine on an already polished diamond. I was told that they are going to leave it as it is.

    Cheers!

  5. #45
    Steve Gombosi
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    57

    Re: Kodak's new T-Max 400

    I wonder if all the recent surveys showing a continued preference for film (at least for some kinds of work) influenced the release of this film. It would be nice to think that Kodak has started listening again.

    Steve

  6. #46
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    9,223

    Re: Kodak's new T-Max 400

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Kadillak View Post
    Kodak has the technology to accomplish this if they chose to do so but T Max 100 is already as sharp as a hand full of razor blades. It would be trying to put more shine on an already polished diamond. I was told that they are going to leave it as it is.

    Cheers!
    Is T Max 100 sheet film going to remain with its UV blocking layer?

    Vaughn

  7. #47

    Re: Kodak's new T-Max 400

    Quote Originally Posted by Vaughn View Post
    Is T Max 100 sheet film going to remain with its UV blocking layer?

    Vaughn
    Don't take it personally but Yes. I do not see Kodak making a change to take out the UV layer on T Max 100 anytime soon since very few people have expressed any desire for this to take place.

    As long as we are on the subject I would like everyone to appreciate the fact that for Kodak to accomodate our request for the new T Max 400 sheet film to not have the UV coating they are doing a separate emulsion coating run at a considerable incremental internal cost. Kodak did not have to do it but they stepped up to the plate to accomodate the alt process and Azo photographers and anyone else that uses a UV light source for their printing process. To say that I was elated that they accomodated us would be a serious understatement.

    Cheers!

  8. #48

    Re: Kodak's new T-Max 400

    Another vote for a 25 sheet box. And I for one would like to see 5x7 available at online suppliers with no minimum number of boxes requirement--as Tri-X and Tmax100 are now.

  9. #49
    Robert A. Zeichner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Location
    Southfield, Michigan
    Posts
    1,129

    Re: Kodak's new T-Max 400

    It seems to me that every 10 sheet 4x5 box I've seen from Kodak was about the same thickness as a 25 sheet box. Shouldn't this simply be an issue of how many sheets they decide to load into the box? I'm certainly in favor of a 25 sheet box of 5x7. This makes life a lot easier for me in that I'm not having to thaw a 50 sheet box just to extract half the contents. It also makes exposed film management in the field a bit easier (more, thinner boxes to divide up different days work or different development requirements).

  10. #50

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Gresham OR
    Posts
    1,374

    Re: Kodak's new T-Max 400

    25 sheets yes, 10 is just to few.
    Another thing i would really appreciate is a longer film envelope. Kodaks film envelopes are just to short, when cut open it is difficult to cover up remaining film and i am always worried that film will get fogged. Perhaps to much to ask but thought i should throw it out there.

Similar Threads

  1. T Max 400 ULF- What Are You Waiting For?
    By Michael Kadillak in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 30-Jan-2006, 17:16
  2. T Max 400 - The Final Push
    By Michael Kadillak in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 23-Jan-2006, 12:15
  3. T Max 400 LF and ULF Film Interest
    By Michael Kadillak in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 20-Dec-2005, 22:52
  4. Kodak T Max 400 LF/ULF Clarification
    By Michael Kadillak in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 20-Dec-2005, 08:13
  5. Kodak T Max 400 LF/ULF Purchasing Update - Lets Go
    By Michael Kadillak in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 16-Dec-2005, 12:21

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •