Flowers Anyone?

[andreios]

Very nice, Ken!

Another print of mine, I'm still undecided whether i actually like it or not

Tulips, study I. by andreios, on Flickr

[SergeiR]

Very nice, Ken!

Another print of mine, I'm still undecided whether i actually like it or not

Dunno about you, but i do like it.

[jcoldslabs]

Take one. This one's a bit underexposed, unfortunately. The film has lost more speed from age than I anticipated.

Kodak 2D 8X10, 240mm Hugo Meyer Doppel Anastigmat, Tri-X (expired 1976).




Jonathan

[jcoldslabs]

Take two.

Pacemaker Speed Graphic, 178mm f/2.5 Aero-Ektar, Polaroid Type 79 (exp. 1994) with a reagent pod from 690 pack film.




Jonathan

[Ken Lee]

Bravo !

[ImSoNegative]

So many talented folks. Here's my first exposure on a 4x5 camera.

I didn't have a cable release, so I was trying to be very "still" while holding the shutter open in bulb mode. Still, I got some shake, I think.

Please criticize! Thanks.

looks pretty sharp to me, very nice. for me it would be easier to set the lens to Time instead of Bulb, in bulb mode I would def. have some shake. nice shot

[jcoldslabs]

Bravo !

Thanks, Ken. This is a case where scanning (except for the dreaded Newton rings!) saved the day. The negative, due to underexposure, is pretty thin and would likely be tough to print by conventional means, but scanners seem to love thin negs and boosting contrast without degrading the image is an easier task than reducing it, at least for me.

Jonathan

[taulen]

Very nice shot!

Thank you ! =)


Here is the aftermath !


Dead daffodils on 8x10, Kodak Portrait 305mm, Fomapan100

[Bush]

Here is taken with Fujinon SF 250

What are they called in English? by dr_aibolit, on Flickr

[Tri Tran]

Another print of mine, I'm still undecided whether i actually like it or not

Tulips, study I. by andreios, on Flickr

Outstanding Andreios, love the tone and the paper texture too.