Page 182 of 355 FirstFirst ... 82132172180181182183184192232282 ... LastLast
Results 1,811 to 1,820 of 3545

Thread: Flowers Anyone?

  1. #1811

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Flagstaff, AZ
    Posts
    1,496

    Re: Flowers Anyone?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Mann View Post
    5x7 HP5 - Pyrocat MC - 180mm Finally got the old Microtek scanner working with the new Imac
    Lovely, Bob.
    Jim Cole
    Flagstaff, AZ

  2. #1812
    bracan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Posts
    452

    Re: Flowers Anyone?

    Polaroid 55 negative scanned like reflective. Sinar P4x5 and Rodenstock 240mm f5,6 wide open.


  3. #1813
    bracan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Posts
    452

    Re: Flowers Anyone?

    Polaroid 55 positive taken with Sinar P4x5 and Rodenstock 240mm f5,6 wide open.


  4. #1814

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    3,326

    Re: Flowers Anyone?

    Not sure if these count as flowers, but they must have been flowers once to produce these seeds.

    Pacemaker Speed Graphic, 4.25" B&L projection Petzval, Polaroid Type 55 (expired 2004).






    Up close:




    Jonathan

  5. #1815
    bracan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Posts
    452

    Re: Flowers Anyone?

    Excellent images Jonathan!!! Love that fluffiness and Petzval renditions.

  6. #1816

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    45

    Re: Flowers Anyone?

    My first image post here. I borrowed a friends Sinar P and have been working my way through a box of HP5+, learning all the different ways I can mess up an exposure. This is indoors, window lit, f/32 1 sec, developed in HC-110. First "sharable" photo, and I'd very much appreciate some feedback.
    thanks!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4x5scans100.jpg 
Views:	68 
Size:	29.9 KB 
ID:	90528

  7. #1817

    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Baraboo, Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,697

    Re: Flowers Anyone?

    Quote Originally Posted by jcoldslabs View Post
    Not sure if these count as flowers, but they must have been flowers once to produce these seeds.

    Pacemaker Speed Graphic, 4.25" B&L projection Petzval, Polaroid Type 55 (expired 2004).






    Up close:




    Jonathan
    I saw the 3rd one and thought "what a shame he didn't get closer." Then I saw the 4th one. Very nice.
    Brian Ellis
    Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
    a mile away and you'll have their shoes.

  8. #1818
    David Lobato David Lobato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Baltimore MD
    Posts
    1,054

    Re: Flowers Anyone?

    Quote Originally Posted by okcomputer View Post
    My first image post here. I borrowed a friends Sinar P and have been working my way through a box of HP5+, learning all the different ways I can mess up an exposure. This is indoors, window lit, f/32 1 sec, developed in HC-110. First "sharable" photo, and I'd very much appreciate some feedback.
    thanks!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4x5scans100.jpg 
Views:	68 
Size:	29.9 KB 
ID:	90528
    Excellent composition, exposure and development. Nice work.

  9. #1819
    David Lobato David Lobato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Baltimore MD
    Posts
    1,054

    Re: Flowers Anyone?

    Quote Originally Posted by jcoldslabs View Post
    Not sure if these count as flowers, but they must have been flowers once to produce these seeds.

    Pacemaker Speed Graphic, 4.25" B&L projection Petzval, Polaroid Type 55 (expired 2004).

    Up close:
    Jonathan
    Sweet photos, and I really like the right side edge from the Polaroid Type 55 shots you've posted. No "app" can ever come close to that!

  10. #1820

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    3,326

    Re: Flowers Anyone?

    Quote Originally Posted by bracan View Post
    Excellent images Jonathan!!! Love that fluffiness and Petzval renditions.
    Thanks. It worked out a bit better than I had hoped. The focus being so spot on surprised me, too.



    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Ellis View Post
    I saw the 3rd one and thought "what a shame he didn't get closer." Then I saw the 4th one. Very nice.
    To be fair the close-up shot is just a tight crop of the first shot, not a separate exposure. I may go back out today and do some true macros. Those little tufts of seeds are actually a drab tan color in reality, but they look better on film than I thought they would.



    Quote Originally Posted by David Lobato View Post
    Sweet photos, and I really like the right side edge from the Polaroid Type 55 shots you've posted. No "app" can ever come close to that!
    Thanks. I love the edges, too! Although, I think you can already buy templates of Type 55 "edging" to apply to your digital photos, so there already is an app of sorts. Of course, instead of each one being unique you just end up with one or two identical frames for all your photos. Plus, it's difficult to make the fakes look real because there is such an interplay between the edges and the emulsion at the time of exposure with real Type 55.

    Jonathan

Similar Threads

  1. Use of f32 and f45 for 4X5 landscapes
    By Roger Rouch in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 5-Feb-2011, 17:16
  2. Feinstein's lighting technique for flower photography
    By Paul Schilliger in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 11-Nov-2005, 13:59
  3. wildflowers
    By derek regensburger in forum Location & Travel
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 24-Mar-2005, 18:24
  4. Photographing Flowers
    By younghoon Kil in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 21-Dec-2004, 19:19

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •