Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31

Thread: B&W Developers

  1. #11

    Re: B&W Developers

    Hello! TMax RS with TMax 400 film in a Unidrum on a roller. Great reproducibility! Best regards.

    Mike

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    954

    Re: B&W Developers

    Rodinal for slow speed, XTOL for high, though every once in a while a batch of XTOL mysteriously fails.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,955

    Re: B&W Developers

    Quote Originally Posted by Toyon View Post
    Rodinal for slow speed, XTOL for high, though every once in a while a batch of XTOL mysteriously fails.
    Just curious when you mention failures. Were they with the 5 liter size, and do you mix the powder with distilled water, and dilute the stock with distilled water?

  4. #14
    at your service
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Port Hueneme CA
    Posts
    32

    Re: B&W Developers

    PC-TEA for pushing
    Pyrocat P for accutance
    My photos are always without all that distracting color

  5. #15
    おせわに なります! Andrew O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada, eh!
    Posts
    5,150

    Re: B&W Developers

    Xtol failures never happened to me...mind you, I've always used the 5 litre packages.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    nuevo mexico
    Posts
    616

    Re: B&W Developers

    I've never had an xtol failure. I think it's all bullshit at this point. Or poor handling.

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Baraboo, Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,697

    Re: B&W Developers

    Except for brief flings with PMK and Rodinol, I've used D76 1-1 exclusively for all formats for about 14 years. D76 has been around for almost 100 years, I seem to remember reading somewhere that it's the oldest developer still on the market. I figure it must be doing something right to have lasted that long with so many films having come and gone.
    Brian Ellis
    Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
    a mile away and you'll have their shoes.

  8. #18
    Gary L. Quay's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Fairview, OR
    Posts
    567

    Re: B&W Developers

    I'm currently using Photographers' Formulary WD2D+ for low speed films, but I want to switch back to PMK Pyro when my current supply is gone. For higher speed films I use Clayton F76+. I have a bottle of Kodak HC-110 that's waiting in the wings. I want to see what results I get with it. I've heard that it's really good. I don't seem to be able to settle on one or two developers. I want to try everything. I have a bottle of Photographers' Formulary FX-2 on order, and I really want to see what Rodinal can do. I'm nostly happy with PMK Pyro, but I ruin a lot of negatives with it. I suppose I really should find something and stick with it, because that way I can more accurately adjust my technique. My darkroom has been up and running for under three years, though, and I still haven't found the magical combination that does everything I want. I'd like to have extremely fine grain, razor sharpness, and decent contrast. Unfortunately for my Pyro habit, I also want to move toward environmentally friendly developers.

    --Gary

  9. #19

    Re: B&W Developers

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Ellis View Post
    Except for brief flings with PMK and Rodinol, I've used D76 1-1 exclusively for all formats for about 14 years. D76 has been around for almost 100 years, I seem to remember reading somewhere that it's the oldest developer still on the market. I figure it must be doing something right to have lasted that long with so many films having come and gone.
    Actually, Rodinal is older. It was first marketed in 1890 (or was it 1892?) which makes it at least 115 years old.

    That said I agree that the differences in developpers are rather small, especially in large format. I mostly use HC-110 and Rodinal myself. I appreciatetheir convienience (high concentration) and their long shelf life.

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Posts
    2,094

    Re: B&W Developers

    I think a discussion of this should include what kind of prints you want to make - darkroom, scan and inkjet, whether they be contrasty like Ansel, or smooth like much of the rest of the pack in the History. Hey, maybe you want to print like Steichen - and that would be a different developer.

    FWIW, I use D-23 these days and I like it.. I print not-so-contrasty, I don't care about a big black in my images, I prefer to reproduce images closer to what I see in the world. This is all totally subjective and opinion-based, of course, and no "facts" are represented...

    Lenny
    EigerStudios

Similar Threads

  1. Any advantages to staining developers when scanning?
    By brian steinberger in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-Dec-2006, 08:15
  2. Staining Developers
    By steve simmons in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 30-Oct-2006, 14:17
  3. I think I am in love...
    By jim kitchen in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 30-Jul-2006, 18:27
  4. Rotary Processors and Dilute Developers
    By Michael Kadillak in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 22-Nov-2000, 23:00

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •