Originally Posted by
Daniel_Buck
ok! here are some interesting results! I sent the negative (tri-x 320, HC110, normal development) off to be drum scanned at 4000dpi 16 bit. I did my own scan comparison with my Epson 4990 (4800dpi scaled down to 4000 dpi, my scanner skips 4000 and jumps up to 4800) At this resolution would print 1 and 2/3 meters wide at 300 dpi with no interpolation.
At first when I looked at the drum scan I was quite surprised at how sharp it was! Then I played with the sharpening on my scan and realized that I could get fairly close to the same sharpness! Granted, it's a bit more edgy looking, but downsizing this to 30 inches (2/3 meter) or less I don't think there would be much noticeable difference. For very large prints however, I'm pretty sure the drum scan would look better. It would be sharp, but not as harsh looking as the flat bed scan sharpened version.
Bookmarks