Simple sites?

**Roger Krueger** · 21-Mar-2007, 23:14

http://www.punktures.com

Not LF, and yeah, the main page is Flash, but only because it's the most efficient way to get type up in an interesting face, not to make stuff fly around.

The body pages are unadorned and, because it preloads the next pic, smoking fast (at least on DSL).

**Jon Shiu** · 22-Mar-2007, 10:17

Hi, my site is simple and not flashy.

Jon

**Jim Galli** · 22-Mar-2007, 10:25

I was in until you said "elegant". Have a look in any case.

**George Stewart** · 22-Mar-2007, 10:47

Don't forget to checkout my lunatic website. I've tried to keep it very simple with no links within any text, which I am thinking of changing as a result of statistical analysis. The software I'm using is very simple but adequate for my purposes. Eventually I'll develop a separate site for my normal (B&W - landscape) photography.

http://www.georgedstewart.com

**Janko Belaj** · 22-Mar-2007, 11:08

Not only LF (MF too), and just an "temporary" gallery made as square format just for fun... hope that that "temporary time" will finish in week or two... LightRecords Couldn't made it simpler... maybe to create better navigation?

**gbogatko** · 26-Mar-2007, 12:45

I don't sell my stuff (yet) -- basically a) no confidence and b) the day job doesn't leave me enough time to make a real business of it. I used photoshop's photopage generator to make the stuff in the large frame and then wrapped it inside the smaller frame on the right.

gb

http://www.inluxeditions.com/InluxPh.../frameset.html

**Mike Putnam** · 26-Mar-2007, 13:22

My site was intended to be simple and as easy to navigate as possible. If any of you folks have any difficulties, please let me know. The Elegance of my site is debatable at best but it has proven to be rather functional for a first effort at a website. Great examples by all the previous posters. Don, great work on your site thus far. It's quite classy/tasteful. Great images as well!