I recently purchase a Graflex Super Graphic so that I can continue my passion fo r black & white solely landscape photography. I am considering picking a few le nses to complete my starter package. Compared to 35mm and medium format there a re relatively few objective non mtf or other chart evaluations of large format l enses available on the Internet. Most of the responses to question like this te nd to get responses that say look at the charts or comment that any of the big 4 lense companies give good results or the question get responses on lenses that were not asked to be evaluated. There also tends to be responses that say that the lense worked great for them without a critical comparison to other lenses wh ich indicates that their experience is limited to that specific lense in a vacum n. It would really be helpful to have real world objective responses related to the lense pairs below. For those of you that have a history with the lenses fr om both companies at a certain focal length, I would like to get your critical o bservations on the picture quality. If you have used both lenses in the combina tions below, please, please give me your objective input. As an aside, if you re ally think that other lenses critically outperform those listed below, please re spond. I am specifically looking for responses on:
Rodenstock Grandagon 90mm F6.8 vs Schneider Super Angulon 90mm F8 Rodenstock Sironar-n/s 150mm f5.6 vs Schneider APO-Symmar 150 f5.6 Rodenstock Sironar-n/s 210mm vs Schneider AP0-Symmar 210mm
Bookmarks