I've been particularly intrigued by the prices of the Congo lenses (http://www.cosmonet.org/~congo/index_e.htm) and the Osaka lenses (dist by Bromwell marketing, see http://www.bromwell.com/bromwell.htm). The rea son for this interest is primarily the price. The Congo 210 mm is listed at $450 right now (with an old list and a fal ling Yen, this might be too high,) as compared to the Rodenstock APO Ronar 240 mm, at $1100 and change.
Does anybody out there have direct experience with either of these less expensiv e lenses? They apparantly lack the APO designation (or at least I couldn't find it listed.) How much of a difference does this make in final image quality? H ow do these lenses compare with a Rodenstock or Schneider, and how do they compa re with each other? The Osaka lenses are available in fewer focal lengths, and seem to cost more (bu t that may just be the distributor's cut.)
Any info appreciated.
Regards,
Bookmarks