Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Negative Problem Diagnosis.

  1. #11
    Bill Koechling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Chicago area
    Posts
    72

    Re: Negative Problem Diagnosis.

    Quote Originally Posted by sanking View Post
    Hard to say for sure. Could it have been a water spot from pre-soaking? A water spot on the negative would not necessarly speed up the rate of development at that point. It could retard it, in fact probably would, depending on the time and rate of induction.

    However, the impact of a single drop of developer is not clear to me. I could see how a drop might impede overall development since it would cause local exhaustion at the point of impact. In any event, for whatever reason, these marks look like splash marks to me.

    Sandy King
    Well, pre-soaking is pre-soaking. Where would the water spot come from? It's soaking in water. I see what you mean about the water spot possibly retarding the development but I just don't see it as a result of pre-soaking. I also see your point about the drops of developer. I just don't see how it would get on the film but maybe it does.

    Poor guy learning how to develop film & has to worry about all these mystery spots. If it were digital I guess it would be dead pixels to worry about.

    Bill

  2. #12
    4x5 - no beard Patrik Roseen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Stockholm, SWEDEN
    Posts
    532

    Re: Negative Problem Diagnosis.

    Further up in the picture is another spot and on top of that there is a piece of dust/small hair. They seem to be in line with the smaller spots you pointed out in the crop as far as I can tell. Could it be that the spots were caused already at the time of exposure? It looks as quite a wet day, salt water etc. Would there be any particular reason for dust or humidity to stick to this 'line'?

  3. #13

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,588

    Re: Negative Problem Diagnosis.

    they're strangely symmetrical and identical

  4. #14
    Senior for sure
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Southern Ontario
    Posts
    222

    Re: Negative Problem Diagnosis.

    They look like water spots on a dry negative, before going into the developer, or, as was mentioned, developer splash. If the former, development will get a faster start on a wet spot than on dry film.

  5. #15

    Re: Negative Problem Diagnosis.

    I don't see any hypo remover in the description of your procedure. A five minute wash for film without it is short. I would wash for 30 mins Also use photo flow as mentioned above.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    153

    Re: Negative Problem Diagnosis.

    Frank,

    I do have Hypo in the line up for 2 minutes: d-76(depends->stop bath(30s)->fixer(7m)->rinse(30s)->hypo(2m)->wash(5m).

    -alan

Similar Threads

  1. Epson V750 Pro 8X10 Negative Question...
    By jim kitchen in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2-Jul-2006, 19:00
  2. Pola Type 55 negative question
    By Donald Qualls in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 17-Dec-2005, 07:44
  3. Negative Prints
    By Ed Richards in forum On Photography
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 23-Sep-2005, 05:37
  4. "Black Hole" on negative
    By Tadge Dryja in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 18-Dec-2003, 17:42
  5. Negative Contrast for Pt/Pd printing
    By Mark_3632 in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 21-Oct-2003, 19:23

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •