Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Exposure Compensation for 210mm

  1. #11

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Spokane, Wa.
    Posts
    30

    Re: Exposure Compensation for 210mm

    Quote Originally Posted by Ole Tjugen View Post
    At 1:1, the extension is 2x focal length, and the exposure compensation is 2 stops.

    With 31 cm extension and a 210mm lens, you need one stop compensation. Think of the aperture scale: 22, 32, 45... The 210mm focal length is 21cm, think of "a tough below 22". Rack it out to a bit below 32cm, and that's one stop. A bit short of 45cm is two stops.
    I "think" what I am about to say is what Ole said--only in American terms. A 210mm lens is 8.25 inches--call it 8 inches. Think of this as f/8. If you extend your bellows to 11 inches--call it f/11, 16 inches = f/16 and so on. The difference between f/8 and f/....whatever your extension equals in stop is the amount of exposure increase you will need. Just convert all your lenses to inches--and take the closest f/stop. Remember 25mm is about 1 inch.

    Sounds very elementary but it really works. I have tested it on every lens just short of 1:1---can't say for sure if it works for that or not.

    Hope this helps.

  2. #12
    Eric Woodbury
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,644

    Re: Exposure Compensation for 210mm

    Slade

    This is the rule I use and have for 20 years. It always works, 1:1 or otherwise. Maybe not close enough for chromes, but I'm not a chrome.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    51

    Thumbs up Thanks, guys!

    I just got my camera about an hour ago and I already love it!

    The accessories will arrive Thursday (from Calumet), but I'm already practising. I placed a subject close-up - about 4 feet away. I measured the length of the camera with bellows closed - about 8 inches. Then I measured after focussing with the bellows racked out - about 12 inches. So, according to what everyone is saying, I'll either open up one stop or double the exposure time. Am I right?

    (As a side issue - what is the optimal aperture for the Rodenstock 210mm f/5.6 Sironar-N MC - f/22? Thanks.)

    P.S. I can't believed the condition my camera and lens is in - they look practically new!

  4. #14
    おせわに なります! Andrew O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada, eh!
    Posts
    5,150

    Re: Exposure Compensation for 210mm

    Isn't the formula: Bellows Extension Squared divided by Lens Focal Length Squared?? I've always used this to determine exposure compensation...

  5. #15

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Spokane, Wa.
    Posts
    30

    Re: Exposure Compensation for 210mm

    You are correct Andrew--some say (bellows extension/focal lenght)squared--all the same actually.

    The method described above has some math behind it but it does work and is used to get rid of the math.

    This is a great article I found regarding this principle--has a connection to this forum as well.

    http://www.largeformatphotography.in...ws-factor.html

  6. #16

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    1,031

    Re: Thanks, guys!

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Grooms View Post
    I measured the length of the camera with bellows closed - about 8 inches. Then I measured after focussing with the bellows racked out - about 12 inches. So, according to what everyone is saying, I'll either open up one stop or double the exposure time. Am I right?
    Perhaps not. The baseline for bellows calculations is with the lens focused at infinity, and it's not at all clear that you started there. At infinity focus, by definition, the bellows extension is equal to the focal length of the lens. You then calculate exposure compensation based on how much MORE the bellows are extended from the infinity position.

  7. #17

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Spokane, Wa.
    Posts
    30

    Re: Exposure Compensation for 210mm

    Since he was originally talking about a 210mm lens I assume he meant focused at infinity when he said "closed is 8in.". "Closed" probably wasn't the best choice of words but I think I knew what he meant.

    To answer your question--yes. If you use the f/stop--f/8 to f/11(ish)--method that would be 1 stop. If you want to do the calculations: (12/8)squared....or 2.25. This gives you an exposure factor of 2.25 rounded to 2x or 1 stop.

    Hope this helps.

  8. #18
    Mtang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    9

    Re: Exposure Compensation for 210mm

    These tips on using the fstop scale as a guide is great, thanks.
    One thing that's unclear to me is - are you suppose to be adding the fstop adjustment (say it's 1 stop, adding from f/8 to f/11 keeping the same exposure time)? If so, it seems counter-intuitive to me, since you need more light to compensate for the bellows extension, wouldn't you open the aperture wider or subtract the fstop
    (say to f/5.6)?
    Thanks,
    Mylinh Tang

  9. #19

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Spokane, Wa.
    Posts
    30

    Re: Exposure Compensation for 210mm

    That is correct. I can see how you could misread this into thinking that is what you need to do with exposure--go from f/8 to f/11. The method only helps you determine how much extra exposure is needed to compensate for the bellows extension. You may be at f/32 or f/22--doesn't matter. f/8 represents an 8 inch (210mm) lens and f/11 represents the length of the bellows when focused at a close object or 11inches of bellows extension. If your settings were at f/32 you could open up one stop or...increase your length of time (shutter speed) by one stop. Either way--with this example you are correct--you need 1 stop MORE exposure.

  10. #20
    Mtang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    9

    Re: Exposure Compensation for 210mm

    Got it. Thanks.

Similar Threads

  1. Exposure Compensation - horseman vhr
    By Hugh Sakols in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 21-Jun-2005, 10:12
  2. Provia 100F : Long exposure compensation
    By kw in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-Jun-2004, 05:11
  3. Conundrum: exposure compensation for rise?
    By Leigh Perry in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 29-May-2004, 05:19
  4. Exposure compensation for telephoto lenses?
    By Bill Glickman in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 13-Jun-2000, 04:17
  5. Calculating Exposure Compensation for Very Wide Lens & Tilt
    By Howard Slavitt in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 6-May-1999, 12:58

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •