Is 20x24 frame for 11x14 too much?

[Chris Strobel]

Well here is a scale I did of one of my images with the left one an 11x14 print in a 16x20 frame, and the one on the right in a 20x24 frame.Which one do you guys think works better.

Chris

[alec4444]

I agree with the mock-up idea. That usually helps me decide. I've liked 11x14 in 16x20, but this is based on the fact that in my hallway where they hang, the audience is forced to be very close to the photograph. If they had the ability to back up 3-4 feet, my choice may change.

That's cool, Chris. I still think it depends on how far away you stand.

--A

[Ron Marshall]

I think the 20x24 looks better because it places more emphasis on the image, while the 16x20 seems to emphasise the frame.

[Mark Sampson]

It really depends on where the print will hang. This is an interesting thread. I've always used 16x20 mats, but now I'll have to check out the 20x24 idea.

[shadow images]

I would go 20x24. It creates much more emphises on the print and a more pleasing package to the eye. The 11x14 is to crowded. Jmho

[Greg Lockrey]

I believe in using the Fibinacci number whenever I set my ratios because it occurs more in nature, and the 20x24 would be closer to that number with the 11x14 print.

[Kirk Gittings]

Definitely the 20x24. I have gone back and forth on this a little over the years, but the 11x14 on a 16x20 is generous (the other feels crowded) and to me makes a statement about the work.

[photographs42]

Chris,
For 11x14, I would recommend a 4” mat on the top and sides and 4 ¼” on the bottom. The reason for the slightly larger bottom width is that, visually, the bottom has to be wider to look the same.

You don’t indicate whether or not there is a border on the print. I have never liked the look of a mat that doesn’t follow the proportions of the image. When there is a small difference, it looks odd. When the difference is huge, it looks contrived, like the mat is more important than the image.

Above all, there is no reason to limit yourself to a so-called “Standard” size.

Jerome

Here is the image matted as above with a 1/2” frame.
Attachment 618

[Keith Pitman]

I think Alec makes a good point: It depends, in part, on where it will hang and how close people will have to stand -- too close and you would lose the effect of the larger frame.

[Chris Strobel]

Me likes!Yes there are borders.So far I've printed my 11x14's actual size at 10.5x13.5 as thats what the pre cut mats I've seen say the actual opening is.Interesting note on the bottom width.

Chris,
For 11x14, I would recommend a 4” mat on the top and sides and 4 ¼” on the bottom. The reason for the slightly larger bottom width is that, visually, the bottom has to be wider to look the same.

You don’t indicate whether or not there is a border on the print. I have never liked the look of a mat that doesn’t follow the proportions of the image. When there is a small difference, it looks odd. When the difference is huge, it looks contrived, like the mat is more important than the image.

Above all, there is no reason to limit yourself to a so-called “Standard” size.

Jerome

Here is the image matted as above with a 1/2” frame.
Attachment 618