Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Wood or plastic holders?

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Rondo, Missouri
    Posts
    2,126

    Re: Wood or plastic holders?

    I must be the strange one here then. I like the plastic ones better. They're easier to vacuum out. I have a Kinetronics antistatic brush that I use to dust them before vacuuming. I've got six wooden 5x7s that I'd trade for Fidelity or Lisco plastic holders any day. One of them needs to be retaped. Two of mine for one of yours.
    Michael W. Graves
    Michael's Pub

    If it ain't broke....don't fix it!

  2. #12
    Stephen Willard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Fort Collins, Colorado
    Posts
    687

    Re: Wood or plastic holders?

    Capocheny, I am keeping eye pealed on ebay. Sal my 4x10 wooden holders are Lotus at $295 a pop when I bought them a while back. Ouch, I bought six of them plus some back up dark slides. However, they are amazing holders with exacting tolerances. No regrets.

    If we were going to go custom what I would really like is a 5x8 holder with the standard 5x7 opening. The holder would be an inch longer. This way when I cut my 5x7 from 8x10 I need only make one cut rather then 3 cuts. The extra inch of film would slide up into film holder and never get exposed. I then would cut the film down to 5x7 later after development in full light. This would make cutting 5x7 easier, faster, and with less handling and reduce dust problems.

  3. #13
    Photo Dilettante Donald Brewster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Malibu, CA
    Posts
    359

    Re: Wood or plastic holders?

    I wish Fidelity still made plastic holders for 11x14. Hard to find used holders in that size and the new wood ones are really expensive.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Baraboo, Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,697

    Re: Wood or plastic holders?

    "I saw a passing reference recently that wooden holders hold film flatter."

    I doubt that any generalization like that would be accurate, so much depends on the particular holder. But I do remember one of the photography magazines publishing the results of a film flatness test some years ago and the winner was an old Graflex wooden holder.
    Brian Ellis
    Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
    a mile away and you'll have their shoes.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    58

    Re: Wood or plastic holders?

    Quote Originally Posted by cyrus
    Not too many good wood holders are left. I have heard that the added benefit of wood is that they're less likely to generate static electricity and attract dust...

    I got a couple for my deardorff but haven't had the time to test them yet. But as far as looks go, wooden holders sure look better on a dorf than plastic ones
    Try some S&S holders, I think you will find the quality to be excellent, and probably better than most older used ones.

Similar Threads

  1. How many 4X10 photographers are out there?
    By Brian Vuillemenot in forum On Photography
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 29-Nov-2010, 08:46
  2. 4x10 Canham Holders do NOT fit my Lotus Camera
    By Kerry L. Thalmann in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 5-Jan-2005, 19:00
  3. fishing for long and skinny
    By Mark_3632 in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 12-May-2004, 15:09
  4. Deardorff wood repairs - Field cameras
    By Bruce McCrory in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 23-Jan-2004, 22:23
  5. How to repair black hinge tape on wood 8x10 holders?
    By Doug_3727 in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 8-Dec-2003, 13:17

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •