Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Medium size ball heads: RRS/Kirk/Markins

  1. #1
    Founder QT Luong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1997
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,338

    Medium size ball heads: RRS/Kirk/Markins

    I have been using an Acratech for a couple of years. At the time the Acratech was released, it was quite unique in its support/weight ratio. However I am not that pleased with it, because of the limited tilt in one direction, the lack for real friction control, and the fact that it takes a lot of force to fully lock. On a number of occasions, I have had camera flops when I though (mistakenly) that the set-up was locked.

    I have noticed that there are now at least 3 alternatives, the RRS 40, Kirk BH3, and Markins. From my research so far, here are the drawbacks I see for each:

    - RRS: smaller ball diameter, pan and main knobs are on opposite sides (does that make it more difficult to operate with one hand ?)
    - Kirk: heavier, not much of a progressive tension control
    - Markins: some complaints of it becoming sticky in cold weather

    Any experiences ? The ball head would be used both with a Canon series 1 and up to 400/5.6, and a Canham 5x7 on a Gitzo 1227. I also have a 1325 with the Arca. Price and original clamp are not a deciding factor.

    PS: I noticed that Acratech came up with a new design that addresses limitations of their original head, but at that point I'd rather try something else
    Last edited by QT Luong; 18-Jul-2006 at 13:54.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    10

    Re: Medium size ball heads: RRS/Kirk/Markins

    QT,

    I own the Markins M20 which I have on a Gitzo. I live in Arizona so I have not had it below 50 degrees fahrenheit. I have used this ball head with a Nikon D200 with 70-200 VR lens, Arca swiss 4x5 and and Arca Swiss 8x10 and have never had a problem with it. I am delighted with this ball head and it has performed as advertised in all situations I have put it in. Hope this helps.

    Regards,

    Miguel

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    280

    Re: Medium size ball heads: RRS/Kirk/Markins

    I have been using a Markins ball head with a Gitzo 1257 for about 6 months. I am very happy with it. It has been a flawless piece of equipment-a real joy to use. However, I have not ever used it in very cold weather and so can't comment on its performance there.
    Dave B.

  4. #4
    tim atherton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1998
    Posts
    3,697

    Re: Medium size ball heads: RRS/Kirk/Markins

    I've been using the Markins M10 (I think) for about a year and so far it's done very well (and improves the things you mention over the Acratech). For a toyo 45A, Technikardan and Phillips 8x10

    It only went out a few times in the cold weather - not really cold, probably only -10/15c. I didn't note any problems then (of course now it's been mentioned I'll give it a good cold weather try out this winter... mind you, the Arca B1 could get pretty stiff in cold weather too)
    You'd be amazed how small the demand is for pictures of trees... - Fred Astaire to Audrey Hepburn

    www.photo-muse.blogspot.com blog

  5. #5
    Jack Flesher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    1,071

    Re: Medium size ball heads: RRS/Kirk/Markins

    Two comments:

    1) I had the same issues with the Acratech and bought the Kirk BH3. For a smaller, lightweight head it performs superbly. Good for up to and including DSLR or field 4x5.

    2) However, if price is not a concern and you don't mind living with a bit more weight to get the ultimate tripod head, take a look at the Arca Cube. It is probably the single best acessory I have ever bought for positioning of my cameras. Excellent for up to and including 4x5 or field 5x7 cameras, but marginal IMO for 8x10.

    My review with images: http://www.getdpi.com/cube.html
    Jack Flesher

    www.getdpi.com

  6. #6
    tim atherton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1998
    Posts
    3,697

    Re: Medium size ball heads: RRS/Kirk/Markins

    aka - "Arca-Borg"
    You'd be amazed how small the demand is for pictures of trees... - Fred Astaire to Audrey Hepburn

    www.photo-muse.blogspot.com blog

  7. #7
    Founder QT Luong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1997
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,338

    Re: Medium size ball heads: RRS/Kirk/Markins

    -10/15C sounds plenty cold to me, but I am a Californian. The Cube is one of the most impressive pieces of gear I've seen, but probably a bit too much on the 1227, which is used so much for 35mm that I prefer a BH design :-)

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    nuevo mexico
    Posts
    616

    Re: Medium size ball heads: RRS/Kirk/Markins

    I've used the Kirk BH-3 with a full Hasselblad kit and a Linhof 4x5. Never a problem. I recommend it without hesitation.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: Medium size ball heads: RRS/Kirk/Markins

    Look at a Novoflex ClassicBall 3.

  10. #10
    Founder QT Luong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1997
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,338

    Re: Medium size ball heads: RRS/Kirk/Markins

    The Novoflex is much closer in weight to the AS B1 that I have than to the medium ball head I am looking to replace.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 25-Feb-2004, 20:27
  2. Arca vs Kirk ball heads
    By Steve Singleton in forum Gear
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-Oct-2000, 13:16

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •