Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Results 91 to 99 of 99

Thread: Has Digital Changed Darkroom Printing?

  1. #91
    multiplex
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    local
    Posts
    5,380

    Re: Has Digital Changed Darkroom Printing?

    Quote Originally Posted by xkaes View Post
    At the Oscars last night, Christopher Nolan started his acceptance of the Best Director Award with a tip for other Directors -- especially budding Directors -- "Consider celluloid".

    He made Oppenheimer with 70m film because, like most of use, he considers film to be the real McCoy.

    But even before his Oscar, his movie created an explosion (appropriately enough) in FILM use -- and the manufacturing of it, of course:

    https://www.thewrap.com/oppenheimer-...wrap-magazine/

    That's good NEWS for all of us film lovers -- whether you consider it real or fake.
    yup, the more use of film and celluloid, the better!

  2. #92
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,397

    Re: Has Digital Changed Darkroom Printing?

    Different cameras evidently have different Ai software. I gave the instruction "fall" to my wooden view camera, and it fell to the ground and broke.

  3. #93
    multiplex
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    local
    Posts
    5,380

    Re: Has Digital Changed Darkroom Printing?

    Quote Originally Posted by xkaes View Post
    'nough said.
    btw I have been doing photo restoration work for various people over the years. kodacolor looks nothing like reality.. not sure how anyone can mistake a photography with realism ...

  4. #94

    Join Date
    Apr 2023
    Posts
    151

    Re: Has Digital Changed Darkroom Printing?

    Celluloid? What little that's left is kept in fireproof vaults, it self ignites at 150C and doesn't need oxygen to burn. Nitrocellulose is the primary ingredient of smokeless gunpowder. Celluloid was replaced by acetate "Safety Film" by 1950.

  5. #95
    multiplex
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    local
    Posts
    5,380

    Re: Has Digital Changed Darkroom Printing?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mal Paso View Post
    Celluloid? What little that's left is kept in fireproof vaults, it self ignites at 150C and doesn't need oxygen to burn. Nitrocellulose is the primary ingredient of smokeless gunpowder. Celluloid was replaced by acetate "Safety Film" by 1950.
    I think the guy was being fancy and just meant film . the fumes from non-safety film / collodion based film is toxic ...
    back in the day ( almost 95 years ago ) when the Cleveland Clinic burned the fumes and fire killed a lot of people
    it was a light bulb and x ray film that did it ...

    https://case.edu/ech/articles/c/clev...linic-disaster

    back in the day my friend was gifted a box of collodion/wet plate negatives ... he couldn't accept them because he was afraid they'd burn his house down

  6. #96

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Hamilton, Canada
    Posts
    1,884

    Re: Has Digital Changed Darkroom Printing?

    Collodion and cellulose are two different things.

  7. #97
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,397

    Re: Has Digital Changed Darkroom Printing?

    Celluloid can ignite. Nitrocellulose was a popular early plastic used even in toys. The "nitro" prefix tells it all. Massive collections of historical valuable negatives have been deliberately incinerated because local museums would have their fire insurance cancelled if they didn't get rid of them; and few have the budgets to properly freeze them.

  8. #98
    multiplex
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    local
    Posts
    5,380

    Re: Has Digital Changed Darkroom Printing?

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Wiley View Post
    Celluloid can ignite. Nitrocellulose was a popular early plastic used even in toys. The "nitro" prefix tells it all. Massive collections of historical valuable negatives have been deliberately incinerated because local museums would have their fire insurance cancelled if they didn't get rid of them; and few have the budgets to properly freeze them.
    there used to be someone on the old ph-aux-3-pee-O site that had some sort of museum collection of sensitive glass images. I remember him saying he was living a'top of 10,000 collodion negatives ... I don't think his last name was Bronson, but it sounded like a Death Wish to me...

  9. #99
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,397

    Re: Has Digital Changed Darkroom Printing?

    There was a private museum somewhere around Denver holding the life work of some late frontier photographer who used a camera 4 ft wide. They had stacks of his nitrate negatives, but were ordered to destroy them, and had neither the time nor budget to copy them. A local photographer did get permission to contact print just a few of those with a makeshift setup, and I actually saw a couple of those huge contact prints - not ideal quality, but now it's all that's left. What a loss to the historical record!

Similar Threads

  1. any of you do your own darkroom color printing?
    By h2oman in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 1-Apr-2019, 13:25
  2. Darkroom printing for other photographers
    By Ilford4ever in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 25-Sep-2015, 20:34
  3. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 21-Nov-2014, 00:22
  4. Digital darkroom
    By Jack Leonard in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 7-Aug-2000, 22:01

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •