Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 42

Thread: Recommended lens for Chamonix 8x10 for portrait/landscape

  1. #11

    Re: Recommended lens for Chamonix 8x10 for portrait/landscape

    With an extra tripod at the front

  2. #12

    Re: Recommended lens for Chamonix 8x10 for portrait/landscape

    This is the answer for my weight concerns….=> it is an issue, but there is a solution if you choose to go that route.

  3. #13

    Re: Recommended lens for Chamonix 8x10 for portrait/landscape

    Quote Originally Posted by Lachlan 717 View Post
    Are you sure you want a Plasmat for portraits?
    That is part of the question. I like the look that you can get with a cooke anastigmat, a heliar or a protar, but am not sold on the petzvals.
    It seems that 16” is the right size, but i assume these are heavy and don’t come with a shutter.

    These extra complications are best to avoid for beginners like me?

  4. #14

    Re: Recommended lens for Chamonix 8x10 for portrait/landscape

    Quote Originally Posted by Kiwi7475 View Post
    The Chamonix handles the Nikkor SW 150 without issues so it shouldn’t have problems with any of the larger 360 mm options you’re discussing here….but if you want light, a g-claron 355mm would work great, and give you large movements; no need to go for far more expensive options….
    The G Claron 355 or the kowa graphic 360, both f9 seem to make sense. Are they also OK for portraits or is it better to go for a brighter 300mm plastmat?

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    297

    Re: Recommended lens for Chamonix 8x10 for portrait/landscape

    The Fujinon L 420 ticks a lot of boxes: single coated Tessar design, agreeable 8x10 focal length, modern shutter, reasonable weight burden on a Chamonix.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    779

    Re: Recommended lens for Chamonix 8x10 for portrait/landscape

    Quote Originally Posted by Steven Ferson View Post
    The G Claron 355 or the kowa graphic 360, both f9 seem to make sense. Are they also OK for portraits or is it better to go for a brighter 300mm plastmat?
    Focusing should be fine at f9 unless you’re taking portraits in very dim light. The only other difficulty would be if you’re using strobes and need a dark environment not to “overpower them” when taking the shot.

    The advantage of a brighter lens though would be to decrease the depth of focus… so it depends what are you looking for….

  7. #17
    Scott Davis
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    1,875

    Re: Recommended lens for Chamonix 8x10 for portrait/landscape

    I'd vote for the 14" Commercial Ektar. It's a big chunk of a shutter, but the overall weight is reasonable. And hey, if it was good enough for Yusuf Karsh, it's good enough for me. I use mine on my Canham 8x10 regularly and have no problems with it on the somewhat spindly front standard. Ditto my 250 Wide-Field Ektar, which is a bigger, heavier piece of glass.

    I haven't weighed them directly to compare but in my mind, the 355 G-Claron isn't a dramatic weight savings over the 14" Commercial Ektar. I'd rather have the tessar design and the faster maximum aperture for doing portraits. The G-Claron would win if you needed to do a LOT of movements as it has the image circle big enough to cover my 14x17 with movement. The Commercial Ektar is going to top out at 11x14 with very limited movement.

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Collinsville, CT USA
    Posts
    2,332

    Re: Recommended lens for Chamonix 8x10 for portrait/landscape

    Quote Originally Posted by Scott Davis View Post
    I'd vote for the 14" Commercial Ektar. It's a big chunk of a shutter, but the overall weight is reasonable. And hey, if it was good enough for Yusuf Karsh, it's good enough for me. I use mine on my Canham 8x10 regularly and have no problems with it on the somewhat spindly front standard. Ditto my 250 Wide-Field Ektar, which is a bigger, heavier piece of glass.

    I haven't weighed them directly to compare but in my mind, the 355 G-Claron isn't a dramatic weight savings over the 14" Commercial Ektar. I'd rather have the tessar design and the faster maximum aperture for doing portraits. The G-Claron would win if you needed to do a LOT of movements as it has the image circle big enough to cover my 14x17 with movement. The Commercial Ektar is going to top out at 11x14 with very limited movement.
    14" Commercial Ektar in Ilex #5 mounted on Sinar board 2 lb 6 1/8 oz
    355 G-Claron in Copal #3 mounted on Sinar board 2 lb 2 3/8 oz
    360mm f/6.5 Nikkor-W in Copal #3 mounted on a Sinar Board 3 lb 5 oz heavy but have used it many times on my Chamonix without problems
    Last edited by Greg; 21-Nov-2023 at 15:03. Reason: added info

  9. #19

    Re: Recommended lens for Chamonix 8x10 for portrait/landscape

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg View Post
    14" Commercial Ektar in Ilex #5 mounted on Sinar board 2 lb 6 1/8 oz
    355 G-Claron in Copal #3 mounted on Sinar board 2 lb 2 3/8 oz
    360mm f/6.5 Nikkor-W in Copal #3 mounted on a Sinar Board 3 lb 5 oz heavy but have used it many times on my Chamonix without problems
    Thanks!
    Nice to hear that weight is not a no - go with one of the f6.5 options. Of these 3 lenses, which one would you recommend the most for portrait & landscape? My other lens is a fuji 250 f 6,7.

    Steven

  10. #20

    Re: Recommended lens for Chamonix 8x10 for portrait/landscape

    No happy users of the Kowa 360f9?

Similar Threads

  1. 65mm lens on Chamonix 45F-2? Recommended bellows?
    By Schuster_Shots in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 14-Aug-2021, 20:16
  2. recommended 4x5 or 5x7 for portrait project?
    By Ben Haning in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 5-Aug-2021, 10:47

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •