No need to apologize...it is a worthwhile consideration.
We are perhaps too diverse to have an open critique policy. Then there are the fragile male egos to deal with (raising my hand).
No need to apologize...it is a worthwhile consideration.
We are perhaps too diverse to have an open critique policy. Then there are the fragile male egos to deal with (raising my hand).
"Landscapes exist in the material world yet soar in the realms of the spirit..." Tsung Ping, 5th Century China
Flickr Home Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/alanklein2000/albums
Flickr Home Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/alanklein2000/albums
Am I missing something? The topics are called Image Sharing and Discussion. How do you Discuss a photo without critiquing it?
Flickr Home Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/alanklein2000/albums
Discussing encompasses a broader range of conversations, including sharing thoughts, ideas, and opinions without necessarily focusing on assessment or improvement.
Critiquing involves a more analytical and evaluative approach to providing constructive feedback.
Here is a simple example between the two:
(1) Critiquing: A photographer shares a portrait photograph in an online photography community.
Members provide critiques that highlight the composition, lighting, and color balance while suggesting improvements to enhance the overall quality.
(2) Discussion: A photographer shares a portrait photograph in an online photography community.
The discussions may go like this:
"I love the natural setting you chose! It really adds to the overall feel of the portrait."
"The lighting is so soft and flattering. It gives the image a warm and inviting vibe."
"The model's expression is captivating, and you've captured a great connection with the viewer. It's a beautifully composed shot."
This discussion focuses on sharing positive thoughts, impressions, and appreciation for the portrait without delving into specific critiques or suggestions for improvement.
It highlights the aspects that the participants find appealing about the image and encourages a positive and supportive exchange among community members.
A distinction without a difference. What you're suggesting is that positive critiques are fine but not negative critiques. A critique is a critique. Here's some edits of your critiques. Why are mine in bold not acceptable?
"I love the natural setting you chose! It really adds to the overall feel of the portrait." but the lighting is too dark in that area if it's the subject.
"The lighting is so soft and flattering. It gives the image a warm and inviting vibe." but adding contrast would draw the eye to it quicker.
"The model's expression is captivating, and you've captured a great connection with the viewer. It's a beautifully composed shot." but her eyes are out of focus.
Flickr Home Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/alanklein2000/albums
What you've done, Darr, is call a positive comment a Discussion. It's only a discussion if someone can return their views and disagree with you.
Flickr Home Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/alanklein2000/albums
Bookmarks