This is 8 lb all in with another camp chair
The vacuum is a chair cane either sitter or me
Printed 4X5 camera weighs nothing
Bags do add up
Very light tripod with spikes, new China, it folds into itself
3 plastic DDS, light meter, short cable release
Tripod goes on my back, very soft light bag
I never use a backpack as I hate them for 50 years
Maybe I got Flickr to work with a Mac and PC
4x5 by TIN CAN COLLEGE, on Flickr
Tin Can
Just yesterday I cobbled together a 5x7 kit which happens to weight exactly twenty pounds...which is when I also remembered this recent thread. So here's my (20 lb) kit:
DIY 5x7 "Minimalist-II" camera (recently modified from original, will post pix soon)
Four Lenses: 110XL, 150 Apo-L, 210 Sironar-S, 305 G-Claron, each equipped with a Pentax 20" cable release
Six Film Holders, each in a Ziplock bag
Five B+W filters (green, orange, red, 3stop and 6stop ND's, plus lens adapters)
Zone VI modified Pentax Spotmeter (latest version)
Feisol "Tall Traveller" CF tripod
Black T-Shirt Dark Cloth
4x Closeup Glasses for focussing
The above is my "stroll-about" kit (up to around two miles RT) - with the camera being carried on the tripod over a shoulder with one lens mounted, and the rest of the gear held in a shoulder-bag...a cheep Quantaray from who knows where/when but which fits everything perfectly and allows quick/easy access. In fact, I can perform all operations without the bag leaving my shoulder, although if the ground is dry I usually put it down.
I can also carry the above in my Photo-Backpacker RPT-3 for longer hikes, but this itself adds another six pounds, with another 2.5lbs for the necessary (for longer distances) liter of water - and possibly more lunch/snax and foul weather gear. Yup, the weight does add up when going on longer hikes!
OTOH...if I replace the lightweight camera and tripod with a Layton L-57 and Gitzo CF, and carry all in the RPT-3, the weight goes up to 34 lbs. Add to this the hiking essentials listed and the weight easily tops 40 lbs. Sometimes worth it but a bit much for these aging bones!
As I got older and less able to carry heavy loads I've done some serious re-evaluation of what's really needed. From four relatively heavy lenses to two, sometimes three much lighter lenses, with lighter lenses I can use smaller diameter filters that fit them all, traded my Pentax spot meter for something much lighter, and carry only the number of film holders that I think are needed for what I'm doing - usually only two or three.
I find I cannot walk far
however
I may add very lightweight 8X10 Intrepid, LN wood DDS, are lighter
I have a secure cabin, the CCC Lodge has very good food
Fall color will be DIGI
Tin Can
Axelwik...I hear you on cutting down even further - like with less/smaller lenses as you mention. Indeed there are times when I'll subtract two lenses, all or most filters, and two or three holders from my above-mentioned kit - getting the total weight down to around 13 lbs.
What I really wish is that there could be a series of lenses designed to combine "modern" (and consistent) performance with small size, light weight, and standardized front diameter so one filter size would fit them all.
Axelwik - I'm curious, what are you now using for a light meter in place of the Pentax digital?
Recently, I put together a lightweight outfit to supplement my Sinar F2 and Bush Pressman. It doesn't take up much space in the car and I can carry it easily when walking around. The camera itself weighs 34oz. (2 lbs, 2 oz.) only. Included in the outfit is a Nikon 90/8, Rodenstock Sironar-N 135/5.6 and a Fujinon 240/9 with, filters, lenshoods etc. and 3 film holders. Total weight 9 lbs and 11 lbs if the Sirui tripod is included. (Actually I would use my Gitzo carbon fiber G 1228 tripod if possible.)
This is the first time I have ever tried to post photos so please excuse them if not sharp.
Bookmarks