Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 50

Thread: Is tray development the best way to avoid scratches? What DON'T you like about it?

  1. #1

    Question Is tray development the best way to avoid scratches? What DON'T you like about it?

    I was wondering, wouldn't developing in a tray virtually eliminate the chances of scratching? I got scratches on the 4x5 negative I developed last night.

    Images here.

    They were small patches of scratches only present on the three points of contact where the negative touches the 3D-printed holder. I was using the 20th Century 4x5 reel. I've used that reel a few times without a problem before. E6, C-41, B&W. I must have agitated the film too much

    Unfortunately, a few scratches are visible on a critical spot in the center of the negative. Have you ever scratched a negative with tray development? Maybe you could rub the film too hard if you grab it wrong. Also, doing the entire process in the dark has to be tedious.

    Also, tray development only works with B&W, right? You wouldn't have the option with E6 or C-41.

  2. #2
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,517

    Re: Is tray development the best way to avoid scratches? What DON'T you like about it

    There is no best

    I use trays in full dark or safe light

    I prefer Gas Burst
    Tin Can

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Posts
    3,805

    Re: Is tray development the best way to avoid scratches? What DON'T you like about it

    Until the advent of those inserts like MOD54 and knockoffs that have followed it, tray developing itself was the best way to scratch film. If you wish to obtain clean, scratch-free evenly developed negatives, invest in a Jobo Expert drum.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    1,581

    Re: Is tray development the best way to avoid scratches? What DON'T you like about it

    Doing a single sheet in a tray is the best way to eliminate scratches. In my experience, x-ray film needs to be developed this way. Tubes are an option for scratch-free development as are tanks/hangers. The latter, though, requires quite a bit of experience to achieve even development. Truth is, all options have up/down sides.

  5. #5
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,517

    Re: Is tray development the best way to avoid scratches? What DON'T you like about it

    Untruth


    Quote Originally Posted by Sal Santamaura View Post
    Until the advent of those inserts like MOD54 and knockoffs that have followed it, tray developing itself was the best way to scratch film. If you wish to obtain clean, scratch-free evenly developed negatives, invest in a Jobo Expert drum.
    Tin Can

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    779

    Is tray development the best way to avoid scratches? What DON'T you like about it?

    Never had scratches using the SP-445. You can submerge it in a larger plastic container with a sous vide and process color (your hands or some contraption are needed to keep it from tilting/floating). I’ve also used their 8x10 tray (SP-8x10) with the dividers to fit 4 sheets of 4x5 and is great for B&W but not for color — large surface means faster temp changes and gradients which for me resulted in color shifts, and it’s not deep enough to submerge into a temp controlled bath.

    Jobo expert is the best system but is a big investment both in cost and space. Worthwhile if you process a lot of color or if money and space are not an issue.

    Tray development works great if you place a glass sheet covering the bottom. That is the only way I can develop X-ray film without any scratches (which is the most finicky film to get scratched). But again, not ideal for color.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2022
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    139

    Re: Is tray development the best way to avoid scratches? What DON'T you like about it

    Doesn't anyone use 4x5 hangars in a deep tank? Is there a better way? In a tray the negative is in contact with the bottom. With reels there is bending and friction.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    779

    Re: Is tray development the best way to avoid scratches? What DON'T you like about it

    Quote Originally Posted by ASA1000 View Post
    Doesn't anyone use 4x5 hangars in a deep tank? Is there a better way? In a tray the negative is in contact with the bottom. With reels there is bending and friction.
    The ones I’ve seen take a lot of chemistry. Good if you’re going to run multiple batches in one sitting until exhausting a large amount of chemicals, and if you can control their temperature. effectively that’s what an SP-445 is, with a lid.

    There is no issue with tray processing due to contact with the bottom. I process double sided X-ray all the time without issues (with a glass sheet at the bottom to avoid scratching).

  9. #9
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,517

    Re: Is tray development the best way to avoid scratches? What DON'T you like about it

    I use many hangers, including 3X4, 4X5, 8X10 singles

    Also 2 up 5X7

    I can process 16 4X5 on 4 up hangers in one go with my Gas Burst DIY system

    Flat bottom trays work fine as, I do 11X14 in them one at a time


    Get it all wet fast and keep it moving

    I will never pay $500 for a plastic drum

    I also process 2X3 sheet in a waffle holder in sealed MF cans


    I also process up t0 14X36" with 2 clips and see saw in the tray





    Quote Originally Posted by ASA1000 View Post
    Doesn't anyone use 4x5 hangars in a deep tank? Is there a better way? In a tray the negative is in contact with the bottom. With reels there is bending and friction.
    Tin Can

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    2,027

    Re: Is tray development the best way to avoid scratches? What DON'T you like about it

    You can't have everything. If you want the best possible uniformity, no risk of scratches, and easy of use, you have to give some on solution volumes/economy and the number of sheets you can do in one go. Note the choice of film is an important variable.

    I had to resort to making my own device for this. Sheet film is a pain in the ass but so be it.

Similar Threads

  1. Tray development vs rotary development of black and white film
    By Marco Annaratone in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 4-May-2022, 04:49
  2. Tray developing - strange marks/scratches on film base
    By Valleyboy in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-Jun-2021, 13:32
  3. Tray Development: Fix Filtering, Minimum Post-Development Processing
    By Harlan Chapman in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 27-Sep-2012, 02:16
  4. Tray Development
    By Terry Hull in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 26-May-2009, 08:49
  5. avoiding scratches on LF negatives during development
    By Herwig Prammer in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 14-May-2002, 05:06

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •