Yeah I also make a pretty decent pizza...I like 'em loaded - first anointing the stretched crust with a bit of tomato paste, then thick slices of mozzarella interspersed with fontina, then onto sautéed red peppers and mushrooms and carmellized onions - then plops of hand squeezed (to drain slightly) san marzano tomatoes (from a can), then some Kalamata olives, maybe some pepperoni or sweet (or hot) italian sausage, and/or a few anchovies - then a generous amount of hand-rubbed oregano, topped off with a long mouli-twist of pecorino romano cheese, with perhaps a drizzle of olive oil...
Then again, there are times when I feel a bit of nostalgia for those thin, limp, drippingly greasy slices we'd get at our local skating rink as kids - with the schmear of acidic tomato paste so hot that the roofs of our mouths would start to peel away within just a few bites - oh yeah!
Oh....jeez...where was I here - lens coatings? (ha! almost said "lens toppings!" )
I think everyone is confusing lens coatings with lens cements, and which greasy pizza goo does the best job of that, and how long it takes in the pizza oven to get the right amount of curing.
I've been thinking about the whole multicoated vs single coated for awhile. There's something that is bothering me, hopefully it doesn't sound dumb, but if it does please help me out to understand it!!
Can you tell if the lens is multicoated just by looking at the glass? Say, if I was to show you 4 different lenses, could you tell which ones are multicoated and single coated just by looking at the reflection?
How about these lenses? Could you point out which one is which?
Sometimes it's EZ to tell, sometimes not. It depends on the lens. The thing is there is no legal definition of "multi-coating". Minolta put the first multi-layered coating on a Japanese lens in 1958. They called it "Achromatic coating". It was TWO layers of magnesium fluoride deposited in different thicknesses to radically reduce glare and flare. If you look at the lens, it looks single coated, but there are TWO layers -- so it is MULTI-COATED.
But Minolta's first "Achromatic coated" lens did not have every surface of every lens element so coated. And today, the same is true. A lens might be "multi-coated", but only have multiple layers of coating on one or two or three surfaces. In short, if a lens does not LOOK multi-coated, doesn't mean it isn't.
Still, on many lenses it is easy to see that it's multi-coated, by seeing different colors on different lens elements. But that is no guarantee, either. It's possible that a given lens has one amber colored coating on one element, and a magenta colored coating on another. They may all be single coatings, but they are different. Does that make it "multi-coated"?
So in order to answer your question, you first have to define "multi-coating" -- not very easy.
Coatings -- of whatever type -- are only applied to the surfaces of lens elements where it will make a difference. There are lots of multi-coated lenses that only have a little multi-coating -- that's all they need.
Thank you! That makes a lot of sense, I’m glad I asked!!
The Fujinon EX 90 is a 6/6 design while the Componon-S are 6/4 optics. Perhaps that makes a difference.
I wouldn't read too much into that. Fuji EX was just a slightly more modern design in general. Rodenstock was also ahead of Schneider during that same general era or decade, whatever.
Bookmarks