Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Why Copal #00, #0, #1, #3? A quantitative answer.

  1. #11
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,517

    Re: Why Copal #00, #0, #1, #3? A quantitative answer.

    Tin Can

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Sarnia, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    834

    Re: Why Copal #00, #0, #1, #3? A quantitative answer.

    Quote Originally Posted by lassethomas View Post
    But there were lenses made for the #2. The infamous Xenotar 150/2,8, the Angulon 165/6.8, the Symmar 240/5.6 and a few more. But there are different versions of the #2 shutters with different threads. I'm no expert and it's rather confusing.
    And the 355/9 Repro-Claron

Similar Threads

  1. I've been searching for year for an answer to this question.
    By marshallarts in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 4-Sep-2015, 14:28
  2. I need an answer from a Century expert
    By Richard Browne in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 1-Jun-2015, 07:42
  3. Quantitative difference in LF?
    By Greg Gibbons in forum On Photography
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 3-Mar-2010, 21:03
  4. Help need the answer for the following question
    By dextrea in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 11-Feb-2009, 14:37
  5. MTF determination: Rodenstock's answer
    By Bob Salomon in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 25-Sep-2001, 22:01

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •