Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Epson 2200 to 4800 - practicle for hobbiest?

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hell's Kitchen, New York
    Posts
    525

    Epson 2200 to 4800 - practicle for hobbiest?

    Lino,

    I don't know how anyone could make an absolute comparison. A comparison needs criteria, and each of us have different criteria. We have different skills, preferences and expectations. Five or six years ago I read posts from people saying that an Epson 3000 with Piezography inks was the equal of silver gelatin. My first thought was that their darkroom skills must have been pretty bad, but maybe they had a different idea from me of what made a print 'good'.

    If your idea of print quality is based solely on numerical D-max and usable density range for example, then the R2400 could nudge ahead of silver gelatin or C-type prints, but it is far more important how that density range is used. The resolution of the R2400 is pretty good as well. If printing on an R2400 doesn't appeal to you, but printing in a darkroom does, then the R2400 may not even be in the running.

    Best,

    Helen

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    126

    Epson 2200 to 4800 - practicle for hobbiest?

    The question is not so much whether an ideal inkjet print is better than an ideal silver gelatin print, but if YOUR inkjet print is going to be better than YOUR silver gelatin print.

    I am no slouch in the darkroom but my inkjet prints surpassed my darkroom prints in most respects a long time ago, around 2000-2001. No, they didn't have the same Dmax but in most other respects they were far better because I could iteratively improve them in a reliable fashion.

    Now with the advent of the new (eg Museo Silver Rag) papers there are basically no metrics on which MY darkroom prints would be better than MY inkjet prints. That's not to say that someone else couldn't whup my ass with a darkroom print, or indeed an inkjet print.

    So I would argue that any comparison of darkroom vs. inkjet in the abstract is utterly meaningless, but once you start to take into account your own predelictions, habits, and prejudice, a clear winner usually emerges. Of course only you know which one it is.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    2,428

    Epson 2200 to 4800 - practicle for hobbiest?

    Get the HP 130 instead. 24" wide, less than 1/2 the price, and the service agreement is peanuts - 300 for three years, I think the 7800 is several hundred a year. The HP satin paper gives great DMAX, it does not use much ink, and the ink is pretty cheap.

Similar Threads

  1. Zapping an Epson 2200
    By Frank Petronio in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 19-May-2006, 07:48
  2. Epson K3- 4800 – How to get the best B&W print?
    By Jack Brady in forum Business
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 19-Jan-2006, 13:36
  3. Rebate on Epson 4800
    By Ron Marshall in forum Business
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 25-Oct-2005, 16:07
  4. Epson 4800
    By Lou Snitkoff in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 22-Aug-2005, 05:24
  5. Epson 4800
    By Bill McMannis in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 7-Aug-2005, 15:41

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •