Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 44

Thread: selling photos are "Arts and Crafts Shows"

  1. #31

    selling photos are "Arts and Crafts Shows"

    Kirk the 8x10's were matted only and the larger prints went for a lot more. I remember prices of 3 and 4 hundered dollars. He must have been doing enough sales to support himself as he took a double spot and had a 10 x 20 tent. I belive he also had friends or relatives in Italy to stay with, and I believe this is what you have to cultivate.

    WG, I use to help manage a CW band and it was amazing what club owner's only wanted to pay. It wasn't worth the effort for me based on my percentage. But I will tell you based on my trade of air conditioning service that a simple life photographing and selling images beats crawling thru an attic in the middle of summer to fix equipment every day of the week.

  2. #32

    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    338

    selling photos are "Arts and Crafts Shows"

    It doesn't mattere if you are a professional or an amateur, but if selling your work is of importance to you than you better spend an awful lot of time and energy in self promotion. Just putting your best work on display will not necessarily lead to significant sales. Ask yourself if you are able and willing to do this consistently. Nobody else will do it for you until you have marketed yourself all over the place. Howard Chapnick used to say that brown (sulfur) toned rural scenes sell best at art fairs etc. But that was a few years ago.

  3. #33

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    308

    Re: selling photos are "Arts and Crafts Shows"

    As a serious non-careeer photographer in Northern California, I've been perusing these shows since the early 80s as well as galleries and museums. For years most selling in such shows seemed to all be doing about the same thing. Hit all the tourist spots and take icon shots. Make modest sized prints and sell them for between $19.95 and $79 bucks un a cheap mat board with shrinkwrap. Since my area of photography is natural landscapes I've always been keen on looking at those putting out such images. Most of what I used to see was not very good. However in the last 15 years a number of better photographers have gotten into it and until the dot com bubble burst there was a period when some of them were doing quite well.

    In the last year I went back and took another look at getting into doing some of those shows. An acquaintence of mine has been doing these shows successfully for some years and manages to do ok though has not gotten rich. There certainly is some big money to be made at the better shows in wealthier locales. However there is a lot of competition too as lots of low end photographers that make that a lifestyle work really hard to get a piece of it. Many of course just do not have very good material but that doesn't seem to make a lot of difference since they sell an array of small art stuff. At one large area show last August in a well to do local city, there were about two dozen photography booths within a half mile long length of show tents. One fairly well known nature photographer that is shooting 617 now did a killing as he had several large LJ5k prints that were exceptional. I made three tours of the show over a couple days and his booth was always jammed whereas all the others were either just barely making enough to cover show fees or hardly anything. I did speak with several. A couple said it would be their last shows and were getting out. My friend made a modest profit. I've always thought someone with really top landscapes printed large would knock people out and do well and that show proved it.

    Then there are issues like judging and submissions. Many of the more difficult to get into shows require a competitive entry of one's art. The judging is of course done in a ridiculous outdated way that works against fine art larger format. And there is often a bunch of limitations on how photography has to be packaged and presented that is not too realistic. For instance framing a 32x40 inch print in a 40x48 inch mat and frame will cost several hundred bucks. It ends up being huge and expensive then one needs a commercial van for transportation. Of course the standard 10x10 foot size of a booth will not allow a photographer of large prints with lots of material to show much because there is only so much booth space. ...David
    Last edited by David_Senesac; 23-May-2006 at 17:47.

  4. #34
    Abuser of God's Sunlight
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    brooklyn, nyc
    Posts
    5,796

    Re: selling photos are "Arts and Crafts Shows"

    Quote Originally Posted by Hans Berkhout
    It doesn't mattere if you are a professional or an amateur, but if selling your work is of importance to you than you better spend an awful lot of time and energy in self promotion.
    This is an ugly, ugly truth.

    It's true even if your priority is just getting a lot of people to LOOK at your work--shows, publications, collections, etc.

    My artist friends with the most success getting work out into the world typically say only a third of their time goes into making art. Much of the rest is spent on grovelling ... I mean, um, promotion.
    Last edited by paulr; 24-May-2006 at 10:01.

  5. #35

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    167

    Re: selling photos are "Arts and Crafts Shows"

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Calwell
    Interesting thread -- do black and white prints sell better than color at these types of shows? I've been to few sidewalk craft sales, and the color photographs all seem to be variations of the same themes -- sunsets, blurred water in streams, fall foliage, flowers, etc. But maybe that's what people want.
    Color definitely sells better.

    The better photographers at a show are often the B&W guys, however.

  6. #36
    Donald Qualls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,092

    Re: selling photos are "Arts and Crafts Shows"

    Quote Originally Posted by Don Miller
    Color definitely sells better.

    The better photographers at a show are often the B&W guys, however.
    The words "at a show" in the above quote are redundant, IMO.

    Disclaimer: I shoot about 99% B&W, and damned near 100% on film...
    If a contact print at arm's length is too small to see, you need a bigger camera. :D

  7. #37

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    167

    Re: selling photos are "Arts and Crafts Shows"

    Quote Originally Posted by Donald Qualls
    The words "at a show" in the above quote are redundant, IMO.

    Disclaimer: I shoot about 99% B&W, and damned near 100% on film...
    And all this time I thought they were just too lazy to find real subjects.....

  8. #38

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fremantle, Western Australia
    Posts
    249

    Selling Photographs (and yourself)

    Sorry for coming into this thread so late, but I do have some experience here which may be of benefit.

    I ran a small stall at the local monthly market for a couple of years. I usually managed to cover my costs each month with 2 or 3 print sales worth a total of around $120 (Aussie dollars, so around US$85). I received follow-up sales of 4 to 6 prints during the month which were directly attributable to my exposure at the market, and I was usually remembered when weddings or portraits were required.

    Of course, I was never adequately compensated for my time; just my financial outlays. However, I don't regret my time spent at the markets. I treated those days as "market research" for my current work.

    In October 2003 I opened my own gallery in which I only stock my own work. I sell many of the same prints now for at least 3 times the price I was selling them for at the market, and I average 2 print sales a day. Some prints (which weren't available at the markets) now fetch $1600 plus framing.

    The difference is in the customers' perception of the of the value my work: people now view my prints in a better environment (ie I control the lighting, sounds and smells in my gallery) and my gallery has an "air of permanency" (I'm an "artist" whose work might be worth collecting because I'll be around for a while). Selling at the markets is done by "unknown and second rate artists" (that's from the customers point of view, not mine ...)

    So while I don't disagree with using markets as a spring-board for your career, don't expect to get rich at them. Use them to judge how your work will be received (just like the photographers that David_senesac mentioned) - if your work is not good enough, it's better to find out before investing $40,000 in your own gallery!

    (Oh, and from my personal experience, colour sells. Everybody says they LOVE B&W, but when it comes time to pull the wallet out, it's a colour print they'll choose.)

    Cheers,
    Graeme
    Last edited by Graeme Hird; 31-May-2006 at 18:20.

  9. #39

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,603

    Re: selling photos are "Arts and Crafts Shows"

    FWIW I think it would be a real hoot to sit under one of those blue canopys and watch people people go by slurping snow cones and eating funnel cakes...

    ...but it wouldn't be as much fun as being somewhere outdoors making photographs with dead people's furniture ;-)
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

  10. #40

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Mancos, Colorado
    Posts
    21

    Re: selling photos are "Arts and Crafts Shows"

    BGlick,

    Thanks for your compliment.

    I've seen Graeme Hird's work over on F/32 site. Excellent material and I have a question for you. Now that you have your own gallery, do you man it or have you hired help? I have been considering that step but don't want to live at the gallery nor have to deal with hired help.

    And an update from my earlier post. I passed on a coming show in Dolores, Colorado near my home. I'm going through some sort of, "don't care anymore", stage. I sold about $800.00 at last years show, netting about $400.00 after fees and cost of materials.

    It has been a slow year so far.

Similar Threads

  1. digitally manipulated photos vs. "pure"photos
    By tim atherton in forum On Photography
    Replies: 104
    Last Post: 7-Nov-2006, 12:27
  2. Shows you how much I know..Unicolor yet again
    By Steve H in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 18-Jan-2006, 17:15
  3. Shows in LA or Phoenix in coming weeks?
    By Bruce Watson in forum Location & Travel
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 15-Jan-2005, 13:59
  4. Two photography shows in Pittsburgh
    By Dave Erb in forum Gear
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 18-Dec-2001, 23:33
  5. Juried art shows
    By J.L. Frost in forum Business
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 15-Dec-2000, 09:02

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •