Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Moving to Ilford from Kodak, begrudgingly…

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Aurora, Colorado
    Posts
    526

    Re: Moving to Ilford from Kodak, begrudgingly…

    I shoot Delta 100 in 4x5 and soup it in Ilford DD-X. I'm very happy with the results I'm getting.
    Never is always wrong; always is never right.

    www.LostManPhoto.com
    www.MarkStahlkePhotography.com

  2. #12
    Daniel Stone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Posts
    2,157

    Re: Moving to Ilford from Kodak, begrudgingly…

    Morning all, Merry Christmas!

    Thanks for your replies, both with experience shared along with some other considerations.
    I know it might be heretical for some, but running a business typically means little to no time for darkroom work. I do plan on sticking with darkroom work going forward, but I would like to eventually scan negatives and output digital, enlarged negatives for printing via carbon. Still much to learn, but this would mean I can start from straight digital files, or scanned film. While I would much prefer to use Azo or Lodima, contact chloride papers are basically DOA for me, sadly.

    I’ll pick up a box of 4x5 Delta 100 and start some testing.

    cheers,
    Dan

  3. #13
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    6,763

    Re: Moving to Ilford from Kodak, begrudgingly…

    Welcome aboard. I started using Ilford instead of Kodak in 1974.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    2,136

    Re: Moving to Ilford from Kodak, begrudgingly…

    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Stone View Post
    Morning all, Merry Christmas!

    Thanks for your replies, both with experience shared along with some other considerations.
    I know it might be heretical for some, but running a business typically means little to no time for darkroom work. I do plan on sticking with darkroom work going forward, but I would like to eventually scan negatives and output digital, enlarged negatives for printing via carbon. Still much to learn, but this would mean I can start from straight digital files, or scanned film. While I would much prefer to use Azo or Lodima, contact chloride papers are basically DOA for me, sadly.

    I’ll pick up a box of 4x5 Delta 100 and start some testing.

    cheers,
    Dan
    If it’s a contact chloride paper you want, Delta 100 is a near perfect match for Salt (ammonium chloride) printing.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    North Dakota
    Posts
    1,329

    Re: Moving to Ilford from Kodak, begrudgingly…

    Just looked at some fine prints from 8x10 Ilford Delta 400. Sure wish they still made it in that size. They really do look nice.
    ” Never attribute to inspiration that which can be adequately explained by delusion”.

  6. #16
    Daniel Stone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Posts
    2,157

    Re: Moving to Ilford from Kodak, begrudgingly…

    Quote Originally Posted by paulbarden View Post
    If it’s a contact chloride paper you want, Delta 100 is a near perfect match for Salt (ammonium chloride) printing.
    Please explain some more. Time is a bit limited right now, but I am happy to start reading about alt processes if you're able to share some links or references you might recommend. Consider me green on this topic, a total newbie.

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    2,136

    Re: Moving to Ilford from Kodak, begrudgingly…

    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Stone View Post
    Please explain some more. Time is a bit limited right now, but I am happy to start reading about alt processes if you're able to share some links or references you might recommend. Consider me green on this topic, a total newbie.
    Hi Daniel.
    Here is a very basic Salt Printing primer: https://www.alternativephotography.com/a-dash-of-salt/

    A salt print is Henry Fox Talbot's "photogenic drawing" process, by which you create your own POP paper by first salting an appropriate piece of paper with either table salt or (better) Ammonium chloride, and then introducing silver nitrate. The decomposition process results in a paper coated with Silver chloride, which is light sensitive. You then contact print a negative on the paper using either a UV exposure box, or sunlight. Exposure can take anywhere from a couple of minutes, to an hour or more. After that, you basically wash the excess silver from the paper, fix and wash it. Its a contact chloride print process, similar to AZO paper.

    Scan of a recent salt print from a glass negative: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...59922760_h.jpg

    And here is Ellie Young's much more detailed volume, from which you can learn almost everything you need to know to make superb salt prints: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...IGqBU202_DIKzQ

    Ellie has a book on the subject: https://www.alternativephotography.c...-print-manual/
    And Christina Z. Anderson's book is also excellent: https://www.amazon.com/Salted-Paper-.../dp/1138280224

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,603

    Re: Moving to Ilford from Kodak, begrudgingly…

    I migrated from Kodak to Ilford and survived
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

Similar Threads

  1. Expired Kodak Photoflow, Kodak Hypo Clearing Agent, Ilford Rapid Fixer > still ok to
    By l2oBiN in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 28-Nov-2018, 16:04
  2. Ilford vs Kodak B&W
    By ignatiusjk in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 22-Nov-2009, 12:28

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •