Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30

Thread: best print developer

  1. #11
    multiplex
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    local
    Posts
    5,381

    best print developer

    another vote for ansco 130 -- 1:2 73º + ...
    i use it for outdated azo ( does that even exist ?), ilford fbmg ( + rebranded p-warehouse )
    kodak polyfiber, kodak polymax fiber, agfa, seagull, ilford. sorry, i don't have any in-date paper.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    best print developer

    If you print the same image with Dektol and Ansco 130, you will be surprised at the difference. Dektol seems to truncate the shadow details.

    More complex formulas (like Ansco 130) have been relegated to small suppliers, and to those people who mix the formulas themselves. In fact, when you get the 130 formula from Photographer's Fomulary, you mix it yourself, out of several packets - unlike Dektol, which is contained in only one envelope. Unlike Dektol, the 130 formula needs to be shipped as separate ingredients.

    I am no expert, but my recent read of the Darkroom Cookbook has introduced me to the notion that manufacturers (like Kodak) often value the economics of scale and simplicity of manufacturing, when considering their product line. In other words, some of the developers that are still manufactured, are chosen for profitability over final print quality.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Posts
    273

    best print developer

    I am just getting into mixing my own, and I am just getting into LF contact printing. My understanding of Amidol (from the Darkroom Cookbook) is that it really works on certain kinds of paper, like AZO, but for most papers, it doesn't make that much difference. Is that correct?

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,794

    best print developer

    KODAK D-72

    Water, 125F/52C 500 ml

    Metol 3.1 g

    Sodium Sulfite (anhydrous) 45 g

    Hydroquinone 12 g

    Sodium Carbonate (anhydrous) 67.5 g

    Potassium Bromide 1.9 g

    Cold water to make 1L



    Versus Adam's version of Ansco 130

    Water (125°F/52°C) 750 ml

    Metol 2.2 g

    Sodium sulfite 35 g

    Sodium carbonate (mono)* 78 g

    Potassium bromide 5.5 g

    Glycin 11 g

    Water to make 1000 ml



    Neither looks more complex/simpler to me. Kodak allegedly put some effort into figuring out how to ship D-72 the way it ships. Now I agree Kodak sells what makes them money but then who doesn't?

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    best print developer

    Does Kodak still sell D-72 nowadays ?



    I don't have my book at hand, but online sources such as this one say that D-72 is "similar to" Dektol. They do not say it is the same.



    Is the formula for Dektol in the public domain ?

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    best print developer

    "Now I agree Kodak sells what makes them money but then who doesn't?"



    You are completely right.



    All the choices we make can sound petty to the casual observer, but when we add them up, apparently minor differences in film, paper, lenses, and presentation amount to something. That something, is what has drawn many of us to Large Format in the first place.

  7. #17

    best print developer

    Dektol and Ansco 130 both give great results with Forte or Adox Vario G I have found that max black with Dektol is about about 30% shorter exposure. The same exposure with 130 gives about 4 more steps of density. I use Dektol for lower contrast images and save the more expensive 130 for the high contrast images.

  8. #18
    Abuser of God's Sunlight
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    brooklyn, nyc
    Posts
    5,796

    best print developer

    not sure about forte nd, but on fortezo, my very favorites are ansco 120 and ansco 130 (easy to mix ... you can find the formulas anywhere). amazing control from a soft/hard pair of developers. i tried a few different amidol formulas, but they were almost indistinguishable from the 130. only worth the added hassle and toxicity in couple of cases, when i needed slightly more contrast in the shadows.

    among pre-mixed developers, one that i really liked was agfa neutol wa ... not sure it's still made. gave a nice scale and beautiful warm tone on fortezo.

    if you experiment, be prepared to discover that many formulas (particularly off the shelf ones) are barely distinguishable from each other.

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Posts
    3,805

    best print developer

    "among pre-mixed developers, one that i really liked was agfa neutol wa ... not sure it's still made. gave a nice scale and beautiful warm tone on fortezo"

    See my second post in this thread.

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    190

    best print developer

    Sprint also has a nice product line if your into the pre-mixed! I find it the same as dektol, although i haven't priced it or used it lately for an over abundance on Dektol, it may be more pricey?

Similar Threads

  1. FX 1 developer
    By Stefano_6020 in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 7-Jan-2006, 10:54
  2. developer for tri-x 320?
    By brian steinberger in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 28-May-2005, 01:23
  3. Film/developer/paper/developer combination
    By Sal Santamaura in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 31-May-2004, 21:53
  4. How to mix a developer
    By Jimi in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-Jul-2000, 07:17
  5. developer for Azo???
    By doc in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 24-May-1999, 19:20

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •