Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38

Thread: MT Classic or MT 2000

  1. #21

    MT Classic or MT 2000

    Wow, you guys have been extremely helpful, and I really appreciate all the comments and suggestions. I think it will take me some time to read all your comments a few times, absorb them and then make a decision. Thanks again for all your assistance.

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    MT Classic or MT 2000

    While it is no longer made Linhof did offer an Outrigger Plate 003754 to mount a Technika upside down on strong, suitable tripods. It allowed you to mount the camera upside down and not remove the accessory shoe so the finder could still be used nd the shoe and retaing screw was less likely to get lost.

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    100

    MT Classic or MT 2000

    Bob S, do you have a picture of the "Outrigger Plate?" I'd be interested in seeing an example of that solution.
    jbhogan

  4. #24
    Whatever David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    4,658

    MT Classic or MT 2000

    I have one and can post an image this evening if no one else comes up with it first. Most people selling them don't know what it is and seem to think it is some sort of flash bracket.

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    832

    MT Classic or MT 2000

    Sometimes I think you Linhof guys probably have brand-name tattoos, too.

    And how much lighter is a RF Linhof from the 'box' model? I'll bet it ain't a big enough difference that you can't make up for it by leaving your pocket change at home.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    4

    MT Classic or MT 2000

    B&H prices:

    Master Technika Classic $ 6,298.95

    Master Technika 2000 $ 5,499.95

    thats Master Technika 2000 loose change of $ 799.00

    JJ, You must have big deep pockets if thats just loose change to you!

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    MT Classic or MT 2000

    E mailed you a picture of it a few moments ago. As David stated, it looks like a very large flash bracket but with a screw on the wrong side of the bracket.

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    100

    MT Classic or MT 2000

    Bob or David- does it slide into the hotshoe?
    jbhogan

  9. #29

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    832

    MT Classic or MT 2000

    JJ, You must have big deep pockets if thats just loose change to you!

    I was speaking of the WEIGHT difference of having an RF model or the 'Box' model. I suspect the difference is the weight of pocket change. And this whole obsession with a little weight just puzzles the hell out of me.

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    MT Classic or MT 2000

    No. One end has a tripod screw to screw it into the camera's tripod shoe on the bottom of the body (not the one on the bed). The other end attaches on to the tripod head.

Similar Threads

  1. Inlet Valve for JOBO 2000
    By Soren in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 4-Feb-2006, 10:38
  2. Differences between Jobo ATL 2000 and 2200 ?
    By Phong in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 15-Aug-2004, 21:30
  3. Jobo ATL 2000
    By tim atherton in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 29-Oct-2003, 03:21
  4. PhotoExpo-East (2000): What did you see?
    By Larry Huppert in forum New Products and Services
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-Nov-2000, 12:03
  5. What's new at Photokina 2000?
    By Dave_958 in forum New Products and Services
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-Oct-2000, 22:44

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •