Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: symmar-s or apo symmar

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    21

    symmar-s or apo symmar

    I'm in the market for a 210 and was wondering what the difference was between the schneider apo symmar and the symmar-s.

    regards,
    Austin Moore

  2. #2
    Doug Dolde
    Guest

    symmar-s or apo symmar

    The Symmar S may or may not be multicoated. APO Symmars are. You will like get a Symmar S for less money if that's a factor.

    I doubt if there's much difference in sharpness...I had a 180mm Symmar S that was super sharp.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    98

    symmar-s or apo symmar

    Austin, the Symmar-S is a multi-coated lens; its engraved right on the front element.

    I have one that is in absolute mint condition that I am about to put on ebay in the next few days. If you are interested send me a private e-mail.

  4. #4
    Ted Harris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,465

    symmar-s or apo symmar

    One quick warning, not ALL Symmar-S lenses were multicoated. If they were then it is engraded on the barrel, ala Jeffrey's. If you are shooting color then you should get a multicoated one. Theoretically the Apo Symmar is a superior lens but you are not likely to notice any differences between it and the multicoated Symmar-S unless you are doing super critical color work and then only maybe and only with very large prints.
    The Apo design by definition has the theoretical potential for higher resolution but in most instances it is that, theoretical.

  5. #5
    Abuser of God's Sunlight
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    brooklyn, nyc
    Posts
    5,796

    symmar-s or apo symmar

    The Apo Symmar has more coverage, and is better corrected off axis. Other than that, the differences are minor. I haven't compared them side by side, but have spoken with people who have used both, and to people at Schneider. My 210 Apo Symmar is an amazing lens--it also has more coverage than I can imagine using for 4x5. Chances are if I had the symmar s I wouldn't be able to tell the difference, at least 9 times out of 10. If you're doing photography that requires extreme movements, or are using it for 5x7, the apo symmar will have more compelling arguments for spending the extra money.

    By the way, the multicoating issue has little to do with the lens's color rendition. I would expect any symmar-s to render color very well. Multicoating will improve overall contrast, and will greatly improve overall quality in high contrast light situations (unless you prefer the look of an uncoated lens ... then it will be the opposite ...), whether in color or black and white.

Similar Threads

  1. 210mm: Super Symmar HM versus Super Symmar XL
    By J. P. Mose in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 13-Aug-2004, 20:48
  2. 300mm f/5.6 Symmar-S [circa 1980] vs Current 300mm f/5.6 Apo-Symmar
    By Myco Megasoid in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 16-Feb-2002, 17:12
  3. 150mm APO Symmar vs 135/235 Symmar
    By Dave Tolcher in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 13-Jan-2002, 04:10
  4. APO symmar 120 vs. Super symmar 120
    By Jon Miller in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2-Apr-2000, 23:57
  5. Differences between Schneider Symmar-S and Apo Symmar
    By Stefano Gatti in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 9-Feb-2000, 11:16

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •