Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Thinking of buying this for Macro photography

  1. #1
    ndwgolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Malaysia/Thailand
    Posts
    395

    Thinking of buying this for Macro photography

    Guys
    I’m thinking of buying a Rodenstock Macro 210mm lens to use with my Chamonix 8x10 to shoot flowers and basically close up macros.............. what do you guys think of this lens??
    Neil
    Come and see what I have done up and until now at www.neilsphotography.co.uk

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: Thinking of buying this for Macro photography

    Quote Originally Posted by ndwgolf View Post
    Guys
    I’m thinking of buying a Rodenstock Macro 210mm lens to use with my Chamonix 8x10 to shoot flowers and basically close up macros.............. what do you guys think of this lens??
    Neil
    Excellent for. 1:3 to 3:1 if you have enough bellows for the ratios and a good enough head to support the camera using that much draw.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    381

    Re: Thinking of buying this for Macro photography

    As Bob said! My Wehman got really wobbly with a 20" Ilex at portrait distance, so I added an extra tripod point on the camera. Or just place the camera on the same table as the motif?
    The 210 has max aperture f5.6, and this makes life more easy

    Big Wehman, Toyo 5x7" and a small Chamonix

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    Re: Thinking of buying this for Macro photography

    It's a great lens (I had one for years) but isn't the focal length rather short for 8x10 ? In other words, isn't the angle of view rather wide ? Are you concerned about foreshortening ?

  5. #5
    ndwgolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Malaysia/Thailand
    Posts
    395

    Re: Thinking of buying this for Macro photography

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Lee View Post
    Are you concerned about foreshortening ?
    What’s that??
    Come and see what I have done up and until now at www.neilsphotography.co.uk

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    381

    Re: Thinking of buying this for Macro photography

    Quote Originally Posted by ndwgolf View Post
    What’s that??
    I had to google, and Wikipedia site about perspective came up

    Big Wehman, Toyo 5x7" and a small Chamonix

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    Re: Thinking of buying this for Macro photography

    Quote Originally Posted by ndwgolf View Post
    What’s that??
    Here's an example of foreshortening: When shooting at close distance, near portions of the subject appear disproportionately larger than distant portions the subject.



    To avoid foreshortening we can choose a lens of normal or longer focal length, which will allow us to shoot at a normal or greater distance from the subject. At greater distance, the apparent difference in size between near and far portions of the subject is ameliorated.

    On 8x10 a typical normal focal length is 300mm. In rough terms, a 210mm lens on 8x10 is like a 105mm lens on 4x5 or a 35mm lens on 35mm film or "full-frame" digital. Would you do macro work with a wide angle lens ? Only if you wanted that particular sense of perspective: it's your creative choice.

    I used my 210mm Macro Sironar on 4x5 and 5x7. You can view some sample images here. In all cases, perspective appears normal, not exaggerated because using a longer lens allowed me to fill the frame from a greater distance.

    Even for portraits, shooting distance (and subsequent choice of lens to fill the frame) affects perspective: see https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4164807. At close distance with a wide angle lens, we observe foreshortening: the noses in these portraits appear to be enlarged.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: Thinking of buying this for Macro photography

    Quote Originally Posted by ndwgolf View Post
    Guys
    I’m thinking of buying a Rodenstock Macro 210mm lens to use with my Chamonix 8x10 to shoot flowers and basically close up macros.............. what do you guys think of this lens??
    Neil
    Quote Originally Posted by Oslolens View Post
    I had to google, and Wikipedia site about perspective came up

    Big Wehman, Toyo 5x7" and a small Chamonix
    Foreshortening is not perspective.
    It is the optical effect that items closer to the lens are reproduced larger then items further from the lens. The shorter the Ellen’s the greater the effect, the longer the lens the smaller the effect.

    Distortion is controlled by the angle not the focal length.

    You could get the 300mm Makro Sironar if foreshortening is a problem (shooting round plates that need to remain round) but you will need much more bellows extension and this is a much heavier lens then the 210.

    If you are shooting objects head on then foreshortening is not a problem, neither is shooting irregular shaped things like rocks or flowers. It all depends on what you need to shoot and what result you need.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    381

    Re: Thinking of buying this for Macro photography

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Lee View Post

    On 8x10 a typical normal focal length is 300mm.

    In rough terms, 210mm lens on 8x10 is like a 105mm lens on 4x5 or a 35mm lens on 35mm film or "full-frame" digital.

    .
    If Pepper No 30 is on 8x10", and 3:1 scale, it would be like a 210mm on 35mm film. You have to try it to see believe it Have not tested, only done the math: 35*2=70mm at 1:1. 3*70=210mm

    Big Wehman, Toyo 5x7" and a small Chamonix

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,566

    Re: Thinking of buying this for Macro photography

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Lee View Post
    At close distance with a wide angle lens, we observe foreshortening: the noses in these portraits appear to be enlarged.
    This is also can be named "nose job", or "recent septorhinoplasty", or Taekwondo effect, usual in smartphone headshots, photoshop may solve it a bit. Anyway I'd say that foreshortening (in graphics) is more related to subject's "inclination":

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perspe...Foreshortening

    "Foreshortening is the visual effect or optical illusion that causes an object or distance to appear shorter than it actually is because it is angled toward the viewer".

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Salomon View Post
    Foreshortening is not perspective.
    It is... See "Perspective (graphical)" in wiki, section Foreshortening.

    _______

    IMHO, in photography & paintings, Foreshortening is mostly about an inclinated subject, in the sense explained in the wiki article. (Andrea Mantegna, The Lamentation over the Dead Christ)

    And this, of course, it may matter macro work, but not always.

Similar Threads

  1. Thinking of getting started in LF photography
    By ndwgolf in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 18-Jan-2017, 00:36
  2. buying advise on Rodenstock Apo-Macro Sironar 120 f5.6
    By TillHunger in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 5-Dec-2015, 17:05
  3. Macro photography with and without macro lenses
    By cjj2003 in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 7-Dec-2014, 12:44
  4. Thinking about buying a Jobo ATL 2+
    By badbrad in forum Darkroom: Equipment
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2014, 18:30
  5. Thinking about returning to Photography,
    By David_Chanter in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-Nov-2007, 08:21

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •