Hi everyone;
The recent threads got me thinking, and this is not a flame war, but i can really use some honest opinions. Here's my situation.
Currently I am chairman of the local heritage committe. Yep, I'm the guy who goes to city hall and begs for that old house not to be torn down because it's a heritage site. I loose 99% of the time.
In that vien, my B&W large format photogrpahy fits hand in glove - everything from archivally documenting current inventory to research on old historical photographs.
Now, in this light, and for the record, two things
- I do not like "aritifical" manipulation of photographs,
- second, in previous threads, all you guys who siad you see no moral difference between manipulation in the wet darkroom or digitally, I agree with all of you 110% - and then some.
Give you an exmaple - we have a 100 year old photograph of a church - large format of course - where, 100 years ago, an artist, by hand, drew in steeples that never existed and to this day do not exist. I cannot use that historical photograph at all becuase if I go before city council the first thing they will say is "hey, if those steeples are phoney, what else false?"
So for archival preservation and historical research, manipulation by hand drawing, in the darkroom or photoshop are all equally out the window.
Conversely however, to me, one point of photography is to bring out detail not easily seen by the naked eye. Example - I shoot infra-red film in 4x5 (Macho 820). Just becasue I cannot see IR light doesn't mean it's not there, and sometimes boosting the contrast on an IR print can bring out important detail lost long ago.
So here's the question - it's a big gray are where you cross the line between enchancement and maniputation. But where is the line? There's a famous court case years ago, a judge ruling on pornography who said "I can't define it, but I know it when I see it." I feel like 'm in the same boat in a way.
So put yourselves in my shoes. Not photography in general per say, but if you were in my situation going up before city council to fight to preseve an old historic building, and you want to restore some old photographs to back up your case, or take some new ones that show how nice that old house is, at what point do you draw that line in that big grey area? Either in my wet darkroom or on photophop, where do I say "oaky, boosting contrast is okay, but not....."? See what I mean?
Maybe enough opinions might lead to a bit of a consensus. Maybe not. In any case, all ideas welcome, becasue it's an issue I face all the time, and i'd like to hear what others think
thanks
joe
Bookmarks