Sometimes I wonder...to what extent is the tremendous variety of our film processing times for a given developer, regardless of N, N-, or N+ intentions, due to an equally tremendous variety of environmentally influenced temperature drifts experienced by forum members...especially those using open trays? Keeping in mind that these darkroom environments are all over the place...as are we.
Of course, with an equal variety of personal/artistic aims, goals, tastes...one would only expect at least some such variety. But still I wonder. Googling processing times for given developers at given times/temps/dilutions, even when researching "normal" (N) development scenarios, can give vastly different results (times).
I bring this up now as I've recently changed my open-tray routine...from batch processing in a single tray to placing films into individual trays - and have noticed (and have re-adjusted for) an even greater degree of temperature drift with this new routine.
Sometimes I also suspect that there may be inconsistencies in the shelf-life of some pre-mixed chemistry runs, either relating to quality control variables and/or to simply having sat on a shelf for too long prior to sale...but I don't want to point fingers here.
Any thoughts?
At any rate...I would urge folks who have not done this - to do a temperature drift test: fill your regular processing tray with the "correct" volume of water, and "process" your usual number of "practice" films (reject images, etc.) in your usual way...noting the temperature change, and the rate of this change, over your proscribed processing time - and from this establish an average mean temperature...one which considers not only the average temp. but also the rate of change over time.
Bookmarks