Photo schools, even at public institutions, exist to support facalty and facilities, not students. Even the "better" schools like RIT are much less selective than before, as the number of photo students continue to dwindle. Considering that almost 10,000 US students per year get a four year degree in photography, you have to ask yourself what happens to them all?
My advice is go to college for a good, broad, liberal education, and then, if they want to persue photography, learn from a place like the Maine Workshops, or self-assignments, or by working as an assistant. Photography by itself is a lousy major, and if you don't know very much about the rest of the world (History, Literature, Science) then what will you photograph?
Harry Challahan taught at RISD, and he had a good job, but to paraphrase him, he said something like "you can learn all you need to know about photography - at least enough to be a successful artist - within a year." Of course he taught lots of four-year majors but he had to pay the bills too.
Bookmarks