Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: dubious coverage claim in for sale listing

  1. #21
    (Shrek)
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,061

    Re: dubious coverage claim in for sale listing

    Quote Originally Posted by Jac@stafford.net View Post
    Perhaps we should have a category for Worthless Lenses.
    A shelf. Or a shoebox.

  2. #22
    Mark Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Stuck inside of Tucson with the Neverland Blues again...
    Posts
    6,271

    Re: dubious coverage claim in for sale listing

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Fromm View Post
    The seller claims that a 75/4.5 MP-4 Tominon covers 4x5 at infinity. Polaroid, who should know, says that it covers 4x5 at magnifications greater than 2:1. 2:1 is a little closer than infinity...
    Really, I'm surprised you all don't know these terms...

    "Infinity" in this case refers to the focal length of the lens when focused on an object as far away as possible. "Unfinity" is obviously the opposite, the focal length when the object is as close as possible, i.e.: in direct contact with the front of the lens. And in the seller's defense, the Tominon probably covers 4x5 at that distance...
    "I love my Verito lens, but I always have to sharpen everything in Photoshop..."

Similar Threads

  1. New FS rule seems to claim its first victim
    By Darin Boville in forum Feedback
    Replies: 116
    Last Post: 7-Apr-2012, 17:46
  2. Bruce Barnbaum’s claim — 20 months later
    By Heroique in forum On Photography
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 4-Nov-2009, 12:06

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •