Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 78

Thread: Which is better for very heavy load: wood or CF and why. Read, only 2 are considered.

  1. #11

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo.
    Posts
    3,064

    Re: Which is better for very heavy load: wood or CF and why. Read, only 2 are conside

    I own both an A100 and J100 Ries tripod. Both are equipped with Ries double tilt heads. The heads are more like large platforms than heads and are extremely sturdy. They also work really well with the Ries tripods becoming a very solid extension of the tripod.

    I also love the Ries leg locks. You can lock any leg in any position if you are on some crazy terrain like big rocks or steps or something. I always lock the legs for added security. A Ries is one sturdy tripod, especially with the legs locked.

    I'm sure carbon fiber is lighter but that just makes it easier to steal in Chicago or St. Louis for that matter!

  2. #12

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    SooooCal/LA USA
    Posts
    2,803

    Re: Which is better for very heavy load: wood or CF and why. Read, only 2 are conside

    Another plus for the wood is if you were a little nervous about something like leg locks, putting on an extra stabilizer arm, leg extensions, etc, you would have no trouble drilling a hole for a wood screw somewhere, or clamping something to it, or some other modification, etc... And maybe something cheaper like a surveyor's tripod you could hack??? (New CF will cost the most...)

    Steve K

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    494

    Re: Which is better for very heavy load: wood or CF and why. Read, only 2 are conside

    Randy,
    I don't own either one but from what I know about you and where you are and what it's like photographing in the city I would choose the wooden one, unless you are going out on a bike like I used to do. It seems it would dampen vibrations that you are likely to encounter from the wind and possibly traffic, and set-up would be somewhat easier than dealing with all those sections of legs.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    SooooCal/LA USA
    Posts
    2,803

    Re: Which is better for very heavy load: wood or CF and why. Read, only 2 are conside

    Oh, and what is another + with wood is that if someone sees you shooting on a wood tripod, their first thought is that you are not a photog, but a surveyor, tradesman, or something else...

    CF looks $$$!!!

    Steve K

  5. #15
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    8,654

    Re: Which is better wood or CF and why. Read, only 2 are considered.

    Quote Originally Posted by Randy Moe View Post
    Oren. I can't buy both!
    Didn't mean that at all. Go for whichever Ries A-series set fits your budget.

  6. #16
    Jac@stafford.net's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Winona, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,413

    Re: Which is better for very heavy load: wood or CF and why. Read, only 2 are conside

    With a wooden tripod if you are trapped in the winter you can burn it to keep warm. Same for Deardorffs.

  7. #17
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,397

    Re: Which is better for very heavy load: wood or CF and why. Read, only 2 are conside

    Although the CF will be lighter to carry and certainly capable of holding the weight of the camera, the wooden Ries has the mass to hold the camera steadier, esp
    in WIND, and will be a lot tougher over the long haul. It also has a bigger top platform, which I personally use to mount the camera directly to, for maximum stability, versus a tripod head. I do use both types of tripods, depending on circumstances. Although the ply construction of CF is quite strong in terms of support, if this material gets a hard scratch or indentation, it's basically over for that leg. I've seen it happen, even to Gitzos. I have broken a Ries leg, but that's cause it got dropped off a cliff, and even that leg they replaced for free! One helluva warranty.

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,603

    Re: Which is better for very heavy load: wood or CF and why. Read, only 2 are conside

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Wiley View Post
    Although the CF will be lighter to carry and certainly capable of holding the weight of the camera, the wooden Ries has the mass to hold the camera steadier, esp
    in WIND, and will be a lot tougher over the long haul. It also has a bigger top platform, which I personally use to mount the camera directly to, for maximum stability, versus a tripod head. I do use both types of tripods, depending on circumstances. Although the ply construction of CF is quite strong in terms of support, if this material gets a hard scratch or indentation, it's basically over for that leg. I've seen it happen, even to Gitzos. I have broken a Ries leg, but that's cause it got dropped off a cliff, and even that leg they replaced for free! One helluva warranty.
    Speaking of Ries, I understand that the company recently changed hands it that true? Has there been any changes to their warranty/service?
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

  9. #19
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,505

    Re: Which is better for very heavy load: wood or CF and why. Read, only 2 are conside

    Quote Originally Posted by John Kasaian View Post
    Speaking of Ries, I understand that the company recently changed hands it that true? Has there been any changes to their warranty/service?
    Copied from Ries website just now.

    http://www.riestripod.com/faqs/terms-and-conditions/

    "5. Limited Warranty

    Seller supplies as its sole warranty the following:

    Tripods and Heads are warranted for life to the original purchaser

    The warranty shall last for Life to the original purchaser.

    The warranties provided for herein shall be governed by Seller’s warranty policies in effect on the date of shipment."
    Tin Can

  10. #20
    8x10, 5x7, 4x5, et al Leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    5,454

    Re: Which is better for very heavy load: wood or CF and why. Read, only 2 are conside

    Quote Originally Posted by Randy Moe View Post
    Let's hear from Gitzo fans about http://www.gitzo.us/series-5-magnesi...luid-3way-head
    Is it good enough, can it carry more than the 22lbs rating?
    Good enough for what?

    If it could carry 25 pounds, they'd rate it at 25 pounds.

    Basic laws of economics and marketing here.

    - Leigh
    If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.

Similar Threads

  1. No high speed film in quick-load/ready-load.
    By Renato Tonelli in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 5-Dec-2007, 18:10
  2. Load capacity wood tripods
    By Morten in forum Gear
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 5-Oct-2006, 11:08
  3. Heavy focussing on wood camera - any cure?
    By Hening Bettermann in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 16-Jan-2006, 09:22

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •