Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Dagor "series" Whats the diff?

  1. #11
    All metric sizes to 24x30 Ole Tjugen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    3,383

    Dagor "series" Whats the diff?

    David, if it's a pre-1930's f:3.5 Xenar, it has to be a "Typ D"! The Tessar types of that age were all f:4.5 AFAIK... There's a 1928 150/3.5 Typ D Xenar sitting in my display cabinet waiting for me to repair the shutter.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,605

    Dagor "series" Whats the diff?

    Thanks to everyone for your advice---especially Tracy Storer! I just won a 100 year old C.P. Goerz 19" f/11 series IV double anastigmat on eBay for 12x20 work. Hot dog!
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

  3. #13
    Whatever David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    4,658

    Dagor "series" Whats the diff?

    Ole, what's different about the "Typ D" design? I've dated it from Schneider's serial number list, and I've taken it apart, and it looks like a Tessar.

  4. #14
    All metric sizes to 24x30 Ole Tjugen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    3,383

    Dagor "series" Whats the diff?

    According to the Vademecum, the Type D is a 3-element lens made "for small cameras only". I think my 150mm is 4 element in 3 groups - like a "regular" Xenar, but reversed: Cemented front group, strongly positive, and an air-spaced rear group which is neutral or slightly negative. From the 1930's on there were other f:3.5 Xenars of Tessar type; mine is 1928 and definitely no Tessar.

  5. #15
    Whatever David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    4,658

    Dagor "series" Whats the diff?

    Interesting. My 210/3.5 is a normal 4-element 3-group Tessar with the normal orientation. It's a heavy lens, definitely not for small cameras. Maybe the "Typ D" was only in certain focal lengths, or they started making the Tessar-type Xenar earlier than 1930, or maybe I've got a serial number anomaly.

    I use it on the 5x7" Press Graflex, and mounted in the normal way it's just a tiny bit short to focus to infinity, but if I countersink the lensboard, I might be able to do it without hitting the mirror. The stock lens on that camera is a B&L 5x8 Tessar, which is probably around 240mm. The 210/3.5 Xenar just fits on a Graflex 4x4" lensboard, so I suspect it was made for a camera like this. As it is, I use the Xenar indoors when I might want the extra speed, and the Tessar outdoors when I might need infinity focus (and then, miracle of miracles, my 12"/6.8 Gold Dot Dagor in-barrel fits the same flange as the Tessar, so I use that one sometimes too. I have a 19" Apo Artar that also fits the flange, but not enough bellows on that camera, alas).

Similar Threads

  1. Whats Gennart?
    By John Kasaian in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 25-Feb-2004, 09:12
  2. Whats the diff between a Compur & a Syncro-Compur
    By Bill Brady in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-Nov-2000, 08:05
  3. Diff. between Horseman 450 and LE?
    By Jeff Green in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 15-Aug-2000, 01:42
  4. the Goerz series III, early Dagor
    By doc in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 9-Sep-1999, 22:46

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •