Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Hypoclear and permawash?

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Moorpark, California
    Posts
    74

    Re: Hypoclear and permawash?

    Quote Originally Posted by jetcode View Post
    The reference was for toning a 'neg' not using selenium as a wash aid.
    I see that but the subject of this thread is the use of "wash aids" not toning negs!
    Cordially, Howard Tanger

  2. #22

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Syracuse, NY
    Posts
    268

    Re: Hypoclear and permawash?

    Quote Originally Posted by CG View Post
    There's an interesting and pertinent article on archivel processing at:

    http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Ar.../archival.html which is an all round great site.

    Best,

    C
    That was a very helpful article, thanks! It provided a very useful counterbalance to the less-specific NPS guidelines, which will come in very handy.

    Thanks again,
    Bruce

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,908

    Re: Hypoclear and permawash?

    Quote Originally Posted by bgh View Post
    Scott--

    The National Park Service employs fairly stringent standards for archival processing and contact printing through its Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record (HABS/HAER) programs. Here is what they say:



    Source: http://www.nps.gov/history/hdp/stand...R/chapter3.pdf

    Hope that this helps.

    Bruce
    With modern papers, such prolonged washing will likely wash out the whitening agents thus reducing print brilliance.

  4. #24

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    New York City & Pontremoli, Italy
    Posts
    884

    Re: Hypoclear and permawash?

    I use PermaWash for both film and paper - it saves lots of water and speeds things up. The sequence I use is the one found on the instructions for PermaWash with more time added to the final wash. Several years ago I tested my paper to see if it met archival standards and it does. A lot depends on how you wash your prints (archival washer, tray washer, siphon, etc.) and the quality of the water. If you are concerned about following archival procedure you will need to test your paper for proper fixing and washing - The Photographer's Formulary sells the tests in kit form with easy-to-follow instructions.
    This is the sequence I use for film after fixing it:
    Wash - 1min
    PermaWash - 1min
    Final wash - 5min

    Fiber paper sequence:
    Wash in archival washer - 5min
    PermaWash* - 5min
    Final wash - 20 min
    * I add 20ml of Selenium toner per liter of working solution of PermaWash

    Kodak Elite and Forte papers required a final wash of 45 and 30min respectively

  5. #25

    Re: Hypoclear and permawash?

    Buy a large size jar of sodium sufite and weigh out 20 grams for ever liter of hypo clear . Much cheaper and just as good or better than what you buy at a camera store.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •