"That makes sense Bob, but why not take that into account when designing a lens that everyone knows will be used with a center filter? ""
Because lenses and center filters are not sold 1:1. Many people work around the need or like the result without the filter.
"Using the filter improves the image but why not improve it further? Why not design in center filters for very wide lenses?"
As the Linhof distributor we once asked this question. The answer was that center filters are harder to manufacturer then the front element of the lens itself. More rejected center filters are destroyed then would normally be acceptable. Since some people do no want a center filter and since many do not want to be forced to buy a center filter and since a center filter is far from inexpensive it would simply be a bad policy to force one on everyone. In addition the lens manufactturers like Schneider and Rodenstock offr either a 4.5 or a 5.6 lens. If the Center filter was built in they would then be offering a slower lens design. However their competiton like Nikon and Fuji both of whom do not manufacturer a center filter would then have faster lenses - albeit ones with more fall off. It would be a terrible marketing choice to let a competitors lens be faster because they did not correct their fall off while at the same time being cheaper due to their lack of the correction. As stated above many users do not see the fall off or can correcct it in printing.
Bookmarks