Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 39

Thread: Can ball head weight ratings be trusted?

  1. #11

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo.
    Posts
    3,064

    Re: Can ball head weight ratings be trusted?

    Quote Originally Posted by scheinfluger_77 View Post
    I am using a Vanguard SBH-250 ball head on my Gitzo tripod to mount a Kodak 2D-5x7. The camera weighs about 10 lbs and the ball head is rated at 44 lbs. While this sounds like more than enough, I wondered how good the lock down was when tipping the camera at extreme angles. As I suspected the head locks down well enough, but the required force to move the camera against the lock is minimal. Meaning in my mind the torque exerted by a tipped 10 lb. camera is considerably more than 10 lbs. Thoughts?
    Put your heaviest lens on the camera and try it at home and see.

    I had a big Linhof ball head once. You could probably have mounted a dump truck on it and tilted it to an extreme angle.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: Can ball head weight ratings be trusted?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sirius Glass View Post
    Is there a recommended ball head that has a hand grip for maneuvering it?
    Novoflex Magicball and Magicball 50.

  3. #13
    Cordless Bungee Jumper Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,123

    Re: Can ball head weight ratings be trusted?

    Something a little less pricy?
    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo.
    Posts
    3,064

    Re: Can ball head weight ratings be trusted?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sirius Glass View Post
    Something a little less pricy?
    Buy used.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo.
    Posts
    3,064

    Re: Can ball head weight ratings be trusted?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sirius Glass View Post
    Something a little less pricy?

    http://www.amazon.com/Manfrotto-322R.../dp/B000JLK5PK

    Holds 11 pounds or 5.5 pounds in vertical position.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: Can ball head weight ratings be trusted?

    Quote Originally Posted by Alan Gales View Post
    http://www.amazon.com/Manfrotto-322R.../dp/B000JLK5PK

    Holds 11 pounds or 5.5 pounds in vertical position.
    Not for a view camera.

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Forest Grove, Ore.
    Posts
    4,680

    Re: Can ball head weight ratings be trusted?

    My experience is that, prior to seeing any strength problems, one will see vibration problems. I would think that whatever tripod/head combination you have, if the camera is within their specs weight-wise, it will hold. But, can you effectively photograph with that support?

    The specifications I've come to suspect are weights of the heads. Using my triple beam balance, I've weighed two tripod heads whose weights were stated incorrectly by the specs.

  8. #18

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo.
    Posts
    3,064

    Re: Can ball head weight ratings be trusted?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Salomon View Post
    Not for a view camera.
    You are quite correct.

    Sirius mostly shoots a Hasselblad and occasionally a Speed or Crown Graphic. I don't know what he wants to use it with.

  9. #19
    Cordless Bungee Jumper Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,123

    Re: Can ball head weight ratings be trusted?

    Quote Originally Posted by Alan Gales View Post
    You are quite correct.

    Sirius mostly shoots a Hasselblad and occasionally a Speed or Crown Graphic. I don't know what he wants to use it with.
    You are correct. I would use the ball head for all three. The Hasselblad would be using the 500mm directly mounted on the tripod, with that much weight to swing taking wildlife photographs I have to be able to trust that the camera will not flop over. Accordingly I need to know that the Graflex Model D and the Speed Graphic are save and secure.
    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  10. #20

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo.
    Posts
    3,064

    Re: Can ball head weight ratings be trusted?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sirius Glass View Post
    You are correct. I would use the ball head for all three. The Hasselblad would be using the 500mm directly mounted on the tripod, with that much weight to swing taking wildlife photographs I have to be able to trust that the camera will not flop over. Accordingly I need to know that the Graflex Model D and the Speed Graphic are save and secure.
    Looks like Bob gave you the best answer then. Hopefully, you can find a "steal" on Ebay like I found on my A100 Ries tripod. Good luck to you!

Similar Threads

  1. Ball head for light weight 4x5?
    By rustyair in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 14-Jun-2012, 09:50
  2. Weight capacity ratings on Tripods
    By ryanchai_85 in forum Gear
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 6-May-2009, 10:32
  3. Ball-park weight of 8x10 setup?
    By Benito in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-Feb-2007, 18:25

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •