I thought I had this figured out but now I'm not sure. Here's what I have been doing:
For 8x10 prints, I started with 11x14 mat but found it too small. So I went up 1" to 15x12, 16x13 and finally 17x14. I found that 17x14 was a little better than 16x13 for portrait orientation but settled on 16x13 for both. So I added 5"
and 6" to the print sizes. Doing the same for 11x14 would result in a 16x20 mat size. But if I found 11x14 - the next size up from 8x10 too confining for 8x10, wouldn't 16x20, the next size up from 11x14, prove likewise? Going back
to my original methodology of adding 1" to each side of the next size up would be 17x21, 18x22. What do you think?
Thomas
Bookmarks